From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-401650-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 64968 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2015 10:43:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 64954 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jun 2015 10:43:13 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-wi0-f174.google.com
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f174.google.com) (209.85.212.174) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:43:12 +0000
Received: by wiwl6 with SMTP id l6so127466030wiw.0        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 03:43:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.194.121.163 with SMTP id ll3mr38730825wjb.142.1435660989318;        Tue, 30 Jun 2015 03:43:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.40.42.151] (089144208151.atnat0017.highway.a1.net. [89.144.208.151])        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v3sm16878211wiy.1.2015.06.30.03.43.07        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);        Tue, 30 Jun 2015 03:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <37378DC5BCD0EE48BA4B082E0B55DFAA41F3F634@XAP-PVEXMBX02.xlnx.xilinx.com>
References: <37378DC5BCD0EE48BA4B082E0B55DFAA41F3F56C@XAP-PVEXMBX02.xlnx.xilinx.com> <2F9346F0-F611-4A3F-B573-B1BEF539E7BF@gmail.com> <37378DC5BCD0EE48BA4B082E0B55DFAA41F3F634@XAP-PVEXMBX02.xlnx.xilinx.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: RE: [Patch,tree-optimization]: Add new path Splitting pass on tree ssa representation
From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:51:00 -0000
To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal <ajit.kumar.agarwal@xilinx.com>,"law@redhat.com" <law@redhat.com>,GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
CC: Vinod Kathail <vinodk@xilinx.com>,Shail Aditya Gupta <shailadi@xilinx.com>,Vidhumouli Hunsigida <vidhum@xilinx.com>,Nagaraju Mekala <nmekala@xilinx.com>
Message-ID: <CD7E7C87-8900-429B-AFE6-69848C119B45@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg02185.txt.bz2

On June 30, 2015 12:38:13 PM GMT+02:00, Ajit Kumar Agarwal <ajit.kumar.agarwal@xilinx.com> wrote:

>>6. Added 2 tests.
>>    a) compilation check  tests.
>>   b) execution tests.
>
>>>The 2 tests seem to be identical, so why do you have both?
>>>Also, please remove cleanup-tree-dump, this is now done
>automatically.
>
>The testcase path-split-1.c  is to check for execution which is present
>in gcc.dg top directory . The one
>present in the gcc.dg/tree-ssa/path-split-2.c is to check the
>compilation as the action item is compilation. For the
>execution tests path-split-1.c the action is compile and run.

One is a superset of the other, no?
Doesn't make sense to me, fwiw.