From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2289 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2011 16:53:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 2281 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Nov 2011 16:53:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from qmta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (HELO qmta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.56) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 16:53:25 +0000 Received: from omta23.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.90]) by qmta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id t3hf1h0021wfjNsA64tHY5; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 16:53:17 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.9] ([24.4.193.8]) by omta23.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id t4rL1h00G0BKwT48j4rLpK; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 16:51:21 +0000 References: <201111041347.pA4Dla6n030692@ignucius.se.axis.com> In-Reply-To: <201111041347.pA4Dla6n030692@ignucius.se.axis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , "ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE" From: Mike Stump Subject: Re: ping*2: [RFA:] testsuite infrastructure for options implied by dg-final methods Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:05:00 -0000 To: Hans-Peter Nilsson X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00611.txt.bz2 On Nov 4, 2011, at 6:47 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > Ping again, CC:ing testsuite maintainers. With the number of qualified individuals commenting in the thread, I was go= ing to stay out of it. If all the breakages and review point others had ar= e resolved, Ok. I kinda don't like the brittle upvars. If someone has a s= ubstantially less brittle method that does not use upvar and is reasonably = concise and readable...