From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 78800 invoked by alias); 2 May 2017 21:11:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 78780 invoked by uid 89); 2 May 2017 21:11:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*m:comcast, bare, metal X-HELO: resqmta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net Received: from resqmta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net (HELO resqmta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net) (96.114.154.161) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 May 2017 21:11:10 +0000 Received: from resomta-po-20v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.244]) by resqmta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id 5f41dMhRVRJJC5f4hdn2AM; Tue, 02 May 2017 21:11:11 +0000 Received: from up.mrs.kithrup.com ([24.4.193.248]) by resomta-po-20v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id 5f4gd9seUZLS35f4hdrpS5; Tue, 02 May 2017 21:11:11 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: spellchecker for comments, plus -Wfixme and -Wtodo From: Mike Stump In-Reply-To: <1493752081-6774-1-git-send-email-dmalcolm@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 21:58:00 -0000 Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <1493752081-6774-1-git-send-email-dmalcolm@redhat.com> To: David Malcolm X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfPuHc1Wkke9wD+5hqE6NY4iA3F/1JRxSoACdT04Q2e3twIPPDJ1aSF8ceY3htY8N0cR4iir7rIksy6LC2H9c2UX8U3vAeLT5xROXgKU8QPwkNE38iXxQ 7OqndEuwNZ7Or3rMYgLWFa+u+/lud01IN6O0WRhYULhiQ2RyBFt5c6o5TuegNA67HxBGwW82JZztg03n1CcpKf/cRHCsMwmGrRw= X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg00142.txt.bz2 On May 2, 2017, at 12:08 PM, David Malcolm wrote: >=20 > As a proof of concept, the patch uses this to add a spellchecker > for comments. :-) > I didn't bother with the autotool detection for enchant, and > just hacked it in for now. Only other comment would be, rather then requiring it, would be nice to mak= e it optional. I can host gcc in an environment that is a bare metal targe= t on newlib. autoconf can smell it, and tell that a ton of things are miss= ing.