OK.  Sounds reasonable.

But from my side, I used to commit patches after full coverage testing.



juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
 
From: Jeff Law
Date: 2023-12-21 11:28
To: 钟居哲; cooper.joshua; gcc-patches
CC: jim.wilson.gcc; palmer; andrew; philipp.tomsich; Christoph Müllner; jinma; Cooper Qu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] RISC-V: Support XTheadVector extension
 
 
On 12/20/23 16:08, 钟居哲 wrote:
> Btw, rv32/rv64gc or rv32/rv64 gcv testing is not enough.
> 
> We need full coverage testing, since we always commit patch after no 
> regression testing on full coverage testing:
No.  It is unreasonable to require this large of test matrix for the 
vast majority if contributions.
 
thead should be able to pick a reasonable set that provides a degree of 
coverage, but they don't need to test all those configurations.
 
jeff