From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 76686 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2017 17:25:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 76660 invoked by uid 89); 23 Mar 2017 17:25:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:534, encourage X-HELO: resqmta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net Received: from resqmta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net (HELO resqmta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net) (96.114.154.167) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:25:08 +0000 Received: from resomta-po-20v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.244]) by resqmta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id r6TYcB1c7oI4Jr6U0cRTPq; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:25:08 +0000 Received: from up.mrs.kithrup.com ([24.4.193.248]) by resomta-po-20v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id r6TzcQfdJZLS3r6U0cipKi; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:25:08 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: [testsuite] Add missing dg-require-effective-target alloca to gcc testsuite From: Mike Stump In-Reply-To: <6e0d0f16-6db5-0369-f0dd-90344f5d272e@mentor.com> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:45:00 -0000 Cc: GCC Patches Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <6e0d0f16-6db5-0369-f0dd-90344f5d272e@mentor.com> To: Tom de Vries X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfOK49WXivtPJzcOAknvtsvCkgo8vCKl5LBqVTjwOthkfEkgE40pZ3eKtqH0e0V/otVipKh7IRp74MCGaSyAsZM/LAq1n42v0+OgBbnAomw/RF5Yd5Wsc neKUA8+k2OM2XDTQND00DRBsdYzzrqSV/JXpbsZMD3kw+u7f75stygvSMzz8q+Od2Q4AjV3IgJ58anJz/Z4Kmb21Qkk6Cd7cXrU= X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-03/txt/msg01244.txt.bz2 On Mar 23, 2017, at 8:46 AM, Tom de Vries wrote: >=20 > I've run the gcc testsuite for target nvptx-none and ran into "test for e= xcess errors" FAILs due to: > ... > sorry, unimplemented: target cannot support alloca. We'd encourage ports to support alloca. :-) > OK for trunk for stage1? Ok. Ok for release branches and trunk as well, if you want. I'd recommend= trunk, if your port is meant to work and test out nicely in gcc 7.