From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix -Wreturn-type with switches (PR sanitizer/81275)
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 07:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D36FA84C-6392-4842-BAFE-9CC6044E2922@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171130225542.GP2353@tucnak>
On November 30, 2017 11:55:42 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Now that the C++ FE emits __builtin_unreachable with BUILTINS_LOCATION
>for fallthrough into end of function without returning value, we need
>to
>see those in the warn_function_return pass which is right after
>building
>cfg. While GIMPLE_CONDs conditionally jumping to __builtin_unreachable
>are
>only optimized during evrp and later, GIMPLE_SWITCH cases that branch
>to
>__builtin_unreachable are unfortunately removed already during the cfg
>cleanup in the cfg pass and thus the immediately following
>warn_function_return pass can't warn. Fixed by postponing that, e.g.
>the evrp pass does unconditional TODO_cleanup_cfg, so those will be
>optimized away pretty early (often already during ccp1).
>
>Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
OK.
Richard.
>2017-11-30 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR sanitizer/81275
> * tree-cfg.c (group_case_labels_stmt): Don't optimize away
> C++ FE implicitly added __builtin_unreachable () until -Wreturn-type
> is diagnosed.
>
> * c-c++-common/tsan/pr81275.c: New test.
>
>--- gcc/tree-cfg.c.jj 2017-11-30 11:40:38.000000000 +0100
>+++ gcc/tree-cfg.c 2017-11-30 12:01:39.496311219 +0100
>@@ -1750,7 +1750,14 @@ group_case_labels_stmt (gswitch *stmt)
>
> /* Discard cases that have an unreachable destination block. */
> if (EDGE_COUNT (base_bb->succs) == 0
>- && gimple_seq_unreachable_p (bb_seq (base_bb)))
>+ && gimple_seq_unreachable_p (bb_seq (base_bb))
>+ /* Don't optimize this if __builtin_unreachable () is the
>+ implicitly added one by the C++ FE too early, before
>+ -Wreturn-type can be diagnosed. We'll optimize it later
>+ during switchconv pass or any other cfg cleanup. */
>+ && (gimple_in_ssa_p (cfun)
>+ || (LOCATION_LOCUS (gimple_location (last_stmt (base_bb)))
>+ != BUILTINS_LOCATION)))
> {
> edge base_edge = find_edge (gimple_bb (stmt), base_bb);
> if (base_edge != NULL)
>--- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/tsan/pr81275.c.jj 2017-11-28
>22:23:34.000000000 +0100
>+++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/tsan/pr81275.c 2017-11-30
>11:50:56.185274379 +0100
>@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
> /* PR sanitizer/81275 */
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> /* { dg-options "-Wreturn-type -fsanitize=thread" } */
>-/* { dg-skip-if "" { c++ } { "*" } { "-O0" } } */
>
> int
> f1 (int a, int b)
>
> Jakub
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-01 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-30 23:01 Jakub Jelinek
2017-12-01 7:06 ` Richard Biener [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D36FA84C-6392-4842-BAFE-9CC6044E2922@suse.de \
--to=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).