From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28803 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2017 15:36:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28565 invoked by uid 89); 15 Sep 2017 15:36:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=him, his X-HELO: mga04.intel.com Received: from mga04.intel.com (HELO mga04.intel.com) (192.55.52.120) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 15:36:29 +0000 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Sep 2017 08:36:28 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.3]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Sep 2017 08:36:27 -0700 Received: from irsmsx102.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.59]) by IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.167]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 16:36:27 +0100 From: "Tsimbalist, Igor V" To: Jeff Law , "'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'" CC: "Tsimbalist, Igor V" Subject: RE: 0006-Part-6.-Add-x86-tests-for-Intel-CET-implementation Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 15:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <1037d75d-4966-ebec-40ae-e25ab875ba6b@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1037d75d-4966-ebec-40ae-e25ab875ba6b@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-09/txt/msg01019.txt.bz2 > -----Original Message----- > From: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- > owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Law > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 11:03 PM > To: Tsimbalist, Igor V ; 'gcc- > patches@gcc.gnu.org' > Subject: Re: 0006-Part-6.-Add-x86-tests-for-Intel-CET-implementation >=20 > On 08/01/2017 02:56 AM, Tsimbalist, Igor V wrote: > > Part#6. Add x86 tests for Intel CET implementation. > > > > > > 0006-Part-6.-Add-x86-tests-for-Intel-CET-implementation.patch > > > > > > From e4a8227e83e8e9f3ddbaa97707f3d335009e0e77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 > 2001 > > From: Igor Tsimbalist > > Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 19:40:40 +0300 > > Subject: [PATCH 6/9] Part#6. Add x86 tests for Intel CET implementation. > > > > gcc/testsuite/ > > > > * g++.dg/cet-notrack-1.C: New test. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-1.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-10.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-2.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-3.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-4.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-5.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-6.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-7.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-8.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-9.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-label.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-1a.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-1b.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-2a.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-2b.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-3.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-4a.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-4b.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-5a.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-5b.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-6a.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-6b.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-notrack-7.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-property-1.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-property-2.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-rdssp-1.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-sjlj-1.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-sjlj-2.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-sjlj-3.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-switch-1.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.target/i386/cet-switch-2.c: Likewise. > > * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_cet): New > > proc. > Whoops. NEvermind my previous comment about x86 specific tests. I > should have scanned the whole kit before starting to comment on the earli= er > patches. >=20 > Uros will have the say on the x86 specific bits. Given it's been 3 weeks= , you > might want to ping him directly to start getting his feedback. Thanks, Jeff. Whom should I ping for other patches review, which are relate= d compiler libraries like libgcc and other target libraries? Igor > jeff