From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01FE33858C56 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 08:14:08 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 01FE33858C56 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=googlemail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=googlemail.com Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id l32so2635533wms.2 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 01:14:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=37303qj8c7nlgaJBsRd2bZ6dH95AjFmuUZfcxYcR71M=; b=dA+I0rTGVtqq2e3QFHD071cjJ1HODY59giL2LzqHzA8lO1q2NI2BxC1mKLIU1pczc2 YXiD5R0l2iQqMu2psR+bEDanxOQmSNnys6uDQR0shwg2qt8fTt4H2bJGIKVM7c45j3Re /Vl7Bwm9wwFyI52YNNTMJJOuHyiTA3d3Hoipihgq4/nIK4XNmeBlVSz+ntLk6uXiU8bf ZycAubR+wScZJdBBVopojANzTa/2yMzbMe7EO4qjFL3M1HuziBlw/Clclagy1lwaMxJn gcN7uvchJHtAvkRjUp4+fHUS7PaZ21wdvGa8kXoT5w8gqTRCepo+ccB7Gycp6W4Q0021 wHjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=37303qj8c7nlgaJBsRd2bZ6dH95AjFmuUZfcxYcR71M=; b=NqJPBDnY6WebAVDPuIOVKryHhyS19kskbknKJz0bBye1f2Y3ly47+ka6T36dG/x568 XR9AX5VuDoosJAlWFXUifR5w6UQdZWJ+r7kdP1yTjRK8HtXlDBAFrn2YeCof7g6+Bvkj 2mAiDxS3M2Og7VNHaj5NJwDSrWBNa38UwrxH8jt39fvH209Ue2r1cZ31rhoMY3g8YWni fiAfyLjus/ViZNHHNYyAfKu5bnvRuHWrVKna2D87tPgcZLbfu5XcK7ozG8owUXxHyeJ3 7gh9Alb4OCMNre+qzbfZhoinhlI8yIcvFdExuay/jHT7kRfR7lt+poyU2GsZz9A9SMZV NfDw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0dfc1KQ8JEearPubEb8tuQ3ST7hBoiY2ORkc9EfpuSSKgrBBd5 tiaQbM9hzKW9uESLaXTkA2k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5jqXlN0fQdXTXswgLoFnqDjIvDZgs6UKfaOEQSZCo//6heSG3xGio7P+/a0VevUB2J0XKAQQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4e8c:b0:3c6:ea09:9cf0 with SMTP id f12-20020a05600c4e8c00b003c6ea099cf0mr799640wmq.43.1665735246741; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 01:14:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.95] (host81-138-1-83.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [81.138.1.83]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e9-20020a5d5009000000b0022e3d7c9887sm1313085wrt.101.2022.10.14.01.14.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Oct 2022 01:14:06 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add Intel Sierra Forest Instructions From: Iain Sandoe In-Reply-To: <20221014075445.7938-1-haochen.jiang@intel.com> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 09:14:04 +0100 Cc: GCC Patches , hongtao.liu@intel.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20221014075445.7938-1-haochen.jiang@intel.com> To: Haochen Jiang X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Haochen > On 14 Oct 2022, at 08:54, Haochen Jiang via Gcc-patches = wrote: >=20 > These six patches aimed to add Intel Sierra Forest instructions, = including > AVX-IFMA, AVX-VNNI0INT8, AVX-NE-CONVERT, CMPccXADD. We also added = intrinsic > for vector __bf16 in this series of patch and Sierra Forest Support. >=20 > The information is based on newly released > Intel Architecture Instruction Set Extensions and Future Features. >=20 > The document comes following: > = https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/download/intel-architectur= e-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference.html >=20 > Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk? Have you tested that the testcases work on older platforms that do not = have support for the new instructions in their assemblers? I could not see any target-requires changes in the testcases .. hence my = question. (otherwise we end up with a lot of spurious test fails on these older = platforms). thanks Iain=