From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from resdmta-c1p-023852.sys.comcast.net (resdmta-c1p-023852.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fd00:56::c]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90AB33858C20 for ; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 00:10:12 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 90AB33858C20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=comcast.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=comcast.net ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 90AB33858C20 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2001:558:fd00:56::c ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1706832614; cv=none; b=xxkVwrJ6Kw2L1V6DXZnAi4yKUqSGRkHecDhAHiVGIBEp2qDzTHlNrGRojUDOtssS406GDvJi3ANTo38jISpLkgBBaU40q7UZzUUjHhKr/gmimY5O65gZEmlFw/R/vnIu3t5lXccIKSv7feJxc3X3LvprS18hrON6tHYYf98emZg= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1706832614; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9RMbFC6eCPhCeXpfsQIc59cgQM+XqAXS8VCD+ir9wLU=; h=DKIM-Signature:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date:Message-Id:To; b=pFVNT/4feHnWA36QuYe6HxSDZ9GbvGiNNZv5YxEeGffGcEYnU/caTdl9RSMesjNJt6CDkTIyH1i3LjbsYti7AT0OgyD9TlNA17lX06rfZ1HJYCfYycrwuZuBWwMF0B7hOiXb/73wTV/jf+mWr6obt3J/NEZJB8aEMGfbcFIGPiM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from resomta-c1p-023810.sys.comcast.net ([96.102.18.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 256/256 bits) (Client did not present a certificate) by resdmta-c1p-023852.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id VgA6rhAw6WI9MVh8GrdCa5; Fri, 02 Feb 2024 00:10:12 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=20190202a; t=1706832612; bh=iAzDVlZ1Utf7y0DwumXg/aMCroVJDT2RNepdU62yyiU=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date: Message-Id:To:Xfinity-Spam-Result; b=x3dn20UeMdcf3L/1OWERx8d0D4qI0ouDFk4T8e2rBN9kpOrn61ugXo8pMe0tton3s 95grx5e3p0Ydr/Blfcv+3rZf6mV02zrK7GJvcgKJagKF9hnPF26TfXraqV5NUOV1xF No4dZh9+8TAtzVFF10Ngh4k9czqLde8is5xzO3KI7xIirplMN9fn52wnw9/vpRRG7f luS7knuINSgvx6Oy8Jd6X1cd1OWwSOCKehVzi2Mi13vlU+9sAz0A7Az4Ryck0LywJL qrzTPEwC9CFzC2+Kgj04yXo32Ccwo1XCcyHM5yn+DcqmFn9KzW97hGqv3Dd+NQjQc9 4+0+ITTdBtszg== Received: from smtpclient.apple ([IPv6:2601:644:907e:710:922:8dcc:d36a:e182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 256/256 bits) (Client did not present a certificate) by resomta-c1p-023810.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPSA id Vh7iriHCxZ9UPVh8FrwEa5; Fri, 02 Feb 2024 00:10:12 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.4\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] testsuite: i386: Fix gcc.target/i386/pr70321.c on 32-bit Solaris/x86 From: Mike Stump In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 16:10:11 -0800 Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Roger Sayle Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: To: Rainer Orth X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.4) X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfDizmBhuXffYR7RflzF9jYXv/n4oz6BkK8jsvp0t/tW7XplLJ/z2zArz7ZtdRLEklTtvEJmRKiOMsx46apw/uaAwALOSWnPav+c+ekBv6C43xNjdBGLL j3p4B7ftzAGMMcUrPFcnHEkyNu7W65mctg+TkKqXZ0/aOXdo29ksiZRsMr8+5xi+szDwd26AUTkWEZodnThhKq4YbYQNe/VqlzbcSyRWmlk/7qsQABkzYiv9 OmxhKmvB4HkhZI7Vbpp3Wx9GLl6TzD3rLzwQ5d2Zzl6yrCn93xAfpU/1BGjBJT3pNKf9/SW+U8M8uSflQM3QNPoLk9xVvPZdBdG0O2ZkWFI= X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,KAM_SHORT,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Jan 24, 2024, at 1:01 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: > > gcc.target/i386/pr70321.c FAILs on 32-bit Solaris/x86 since its > introduction in > > commit 43201f2c2173894bf7c423cad6da1c21567e06c0 > Author: Roger Sayle > Date: Mon May 30 21:20:09 2022 +0100 > > PR target/70321: Split double word equality/inequality after STV on x86. > > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr70321.c scan-assembler-times mov 1 > > The failure happens because 32-bit Solaris/x86 defaults to > -fno-omit-frame-pointer. > > Fixed by specifying -fomit-frame-pointer explicitly. > > Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11 and i686-pc-linux-gnu. > > Ok for trunk? Ok.