Re: [PATCH] Fix PRs middle-end/15014 and middle-end/16973, removing labels with their address taken

[Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 482 bytes --]


On Oct 18, 2004, at 3:26 PM, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> It appears that you move the label to the start of the previous
> block, which is probably OK.  I would have moved the label to
> the start of the next block which would probably have been less
> disruptive in terms of the location of the label.  However, given
> the label is not reachable in the flow sense that's probably OK.
>
> Approved.

Thanks.

I also applied the following testcase for PR 16973.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski


[-- Attachment #2: temp.diff.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 492 bytes --]

Index: testsuite/gcc.dg/pr16973.c
===================================================================
RCS file: testsuite/gcc.dg/pr16973.c
diff -N testsuite/gcc.dg/pr16973.c
--- /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ testsuite/gcc.dg/pr16973.c	18 Oct 2004 19:35:26 -0000
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+/* We were removing the label "a" because
+   we were removing the BB for it but forgot
+   to add back the label.   */
+
+void
+f (void)
+{
+  static __SIZE_TYPE__ x = &&a - &&b;
+  a : b : return;
+}