From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20994 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2015 17:34:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20976 invoked by uid 89); 2 Dec 2015 17:34:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (208.118.235.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 17:34:40 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4BIZ-0007LX-D0 for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 12:34:38 -0500 Received: from oarmail.oarcorp.com ([67.63.146.244]:25522) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4BIZ-0007LR-7t for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 12:34:35 -0500 Received: from [IPv6:2607:fb90:240b:60ea:7405:2db8:a1cd:edc9] (172.56.34.19) by OARmail.OARCORP.com (192.168.2.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.389.2; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 11:34:25 -0600 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <565E9A4E.6070101@redhat.com> References: <3667951.xxJfb3I2z2@kubuntu> <4179765.TvvTxxOOIv@kubuntu> <565CD982.1020805@redhat.com> <3224199.SZl8o2VGj7@kubuntu> <565E9A4E.6070101@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix declaration of pthread-structs in s-osinte-rtems.ads (ada/68169) From: Joel Sherrill Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 17:34:00 -0000 To: Jeff Law ,Jan Sommer ,"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" CC: "devel@rtems.org" ,"sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de" Message-ID: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows XP X-Received-From: 67.63.146.244 X-SW-Source: 2015-12/txt/msg00321.txt.bz2 On December 2, 2015 2:14:22 AM EST, Jeff Law wrote: >On 12/01/2015 12:56 PM, Jan Sommer wrote: >> Am Monday 30 November 2015, 16:19:30 schrieb Jeff Law: >>> On 11/30/2015 03:06 PM, Jan Sommer wrote: >>>> Could someone with write access please commit the patch? >>>> The paperwork with the FSF has gone through. If something else is >missing, please tell me. >>>> I won't be available next week. >>> I'm not sure what you built your patches again, but I can't apply >them >>> to the trunk. Can you resend a patch as a diff against the trunk. >>> >>> Often I can fix things by hand, but this is Ada and I'd be much more >>> likely to botch something. >> >> I updated the patches again. They should now fit with the heads of >the respective branches again. >> Maybe the Changelog will be out of synch again. >> The patches are for the following branches: >> ada-68169_4.9.diff --> gcc-4_9-branch >> ada-68169_5.x.diff --> gcc-5-branch >> ada-68169_trunk.diff --> trunk >> >> Let me know if they apply this time. I used svn diff to create them >and used patch -p0 to test if they apply locally. >THanks. I've committed this to the trunk based on Joel's comments. > >The gcc-5 branch is frozen for the upcoming release and gcc-4.9 is=20 >regression/doc fixes only. It'll be up to the release managers whether > >or not to backport to those branches. Thanks Jeff.=20 I would consider this a regression. RTEMS changed the pthread_attr_t when w= e added thread affinity and updating Ada to match slipped through. We knew = it needed attention for SMP but missed this critical piece to keep it worki= ng. Jan.. Is there a gcc PR for this? To get it on a release branch, it is bett= er to have one. >Thanks. > >Jeff --joel