From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5666 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2010 22:34:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 5522 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Nov 2010 22:34:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-wy0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-wy0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:34:19 +0000 Received: by wya21 with SMTP id 21so1237628wya.20 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 15:34:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.181.84 with SMTP id k62mr1165728wem.76.1288823656560; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 15:34:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.101] (chufi.coudert.name [88.162.139.106]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x15sm5975128weq.31.2010.11.03.15.34.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 03 Nov 2010 15:34:15 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [patch] Separate {OS,CPU}_CPP_BUILTINS macros into C-family and language-independent macros Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: FX In-Reply-To: <258DDD1F44B6ED4AAFD4370847CF58D50DA7D996@csomb01.corp.atmel.com> Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:35:00 -0000 Cc: , "gfortran List" , "Michael Meissner" , "Rainer Orth" , , Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <1D974441-C894-4F24-A0D1-7B693044B2BF@gmail.com> <258DDD1F44B6ED4AAFD4370847CF58D50DA7D996@csomb01.corp.atmel.com> To: "Weddington, Eric" Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00374.txt.bz2 > That's news to me: I didn't know that you could now build the Fortran com= piler for the AVR. (Not that anyone would seriously use it, but.. you never= know.) Last I heard, the Fortran FE couldn't be built for the AVR because = that port only has 32-bit doubles. See gcc bug #34040. Oh, it does build, it's just thoroughly unusable! :) (Well, it does preprocess code OK, trouble comes later...) FX