From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6969 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2014 18:54:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6959 invoked by uid 89); 21 Nov 2014 18:54:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: DUB004-OMC2S11.hotmail.com Received: from dub004-omc2s11.hotmail.com (HELO DUB004-OMC2S11.hotmail.com) (157.55.1.150) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 18:54:37 +0000 Received: from DUB118-W41 ([157.55.1.138]) by DUB004-OMC2S11.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Fri, 21 Nov 2014 10:54:34 -0800 X-TMN: [aEi2KObuzzZb1jLm1g7HIyCFYMFneNlz] Message-ID: From: Bernd Edlinger To: Ilya Verbin CC: Kirill Yukhin , Andrey Turetskiy , Jakub Jelinek , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/4] OpenMP 4.0 offloading to Intel MIC: non-fallback testing Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:01:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20141121184440.GA63468@msticlxl57.ims.intel.com> References: ,<20141121184440.GA63468@msticlxl57.ims.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg02834.txt.bz2 Hi Ilya, On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 21:44:40, Ilya Verbin wrote: > > Hi, > > On 21 Nov 19:19, Bernd Edlinger wrote: >> so, did you really regenerate Makefile.in in that patch, or am I missing= something ? > > You're right. This patch was rebased so many times, that we may forget to > regenerate it before committing. > > Do you plan to submit any patch for Makefile.in? > Or should I post this change separately for review? (with regtesting) > > -- Ilya No, at least not immediately, so I would prefer if you go ahead with your p= atch ASAP. Thanks, Bernd. =20=09=09=20=09=20=20=20=09=09=20=20