From: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
To: Dodji Seketeli <dodji@redhat.com>
Cc: "Jakub Jelinek" <jakub@redhat.com>,
"Manuel López-Ibáñez" <lopezibanez@gmail.com>,
gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] preprocessor/58580 - preprocessor goes OOM with warning for zero literals
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 22:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DUB122-W35F01E0392298F2517D926E4F00@phx.gbl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k3gnqj7k.fsf@redhat.com>
Sorry Dodji,
I still do not see how this is supposed to work:
If the previous invocation of get_line already had read some
characters of the following line(s), how is that information
recovered?
I see it is copied behind lineptr[cur_len].
But when get_line is re-entered, cur_len is set to zero again.
and all that contents up to 16K are forgotten. Right?
If an empty line of just a new-line is read, the return value
of get_line is 0, and string is "". But the return value of
read_line is NULL in that case. Now the function
location_get_source_line will leave the while loop.
But there may be more lines, propably not just empty ones?
How did you test your patch?
Regards
Bernd.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-06 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-31 14:48 Bernd Edlinger
2013-10-31 15:06 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-10-31 15:19 ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-10-31 18:26 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-11-04 11:52 ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-04 11:59 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-11-04 15:42 ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-05 0:10 ` Bernd Edlinger
2013-11-05 9:50 ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-05 11:19 ` Bernd Edlinger
2013-11-05 11:43 ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-06 22:27 ` Bernd Edlinger [this message]
2013-11-04 12:06 ` Bernd Edlinger
2013-11-04 12:15 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-11-04 12:32 ` Bernd Edlinger
2013-11-04 15:21 ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-11 10:49 ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-11 14:35 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-11-11 17:13 ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-12 16:42 ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-13 5:10 ` Bernd Edlinger
2013-11-13 9:40 ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-13 9:43 ` Bernd Edlinger
2013-11-13 9:49 ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-13 9:49 ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-13 9:51 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-11-14 15:12 ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-12-09 20:11 ` Tom Tromey
2014-01-21 12:28 ` Bernd Edlinger
2014-01-22 8:16 ` Dodji Seketeli
2014-01-23 17:12 ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-01-24 2:58 ` Bernd Edlinger
2014-01-24 7:53 ` Dodji Seketeli
2014-01-24 15:05 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-01-24 15:41 ` Dodji Seketeli
2014-01-24 15:44 ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-01-24 16:09 ` Dodji Seketeli
2014-01-24 16:13 ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-01-24 23:02 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-01-24 23:20 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-01-28 13:20 ` Dodji Seketeli
2014-01-28 13:23 ` Dodji Seketeli
2014-01-28 18:40 ` H.J. Lu
2014-01-29 11:28 ` Dodji Seketeli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-10-31 13:45 Dodji Seketeli
2013-10-31 17:30 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DUB122-W35F01E0392298F2517D926E4F00@phx.gbl \
--to=bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de \
--cc=dodji@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=lopezibanez@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).