public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Dodji Seketeli <dodji@redhat.com>,
	"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org"	<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] preprocessor/58580 - preprocessor goes OOM with warning for zero literals
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 12:32:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DUB122-W7FF5D62CA458FD7931EA9E4F60@phx.gbl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131104120636.GP27813@tucnak.zalov.cz>

>
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 12:59:49PM +0100, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> I see another "read_line" at gcov.c, which seems to be a copy.
>
> Copy of what? gcov.c read_line hardly can be allowed to fail because out of
> mem unlike this one for caret diagnostics.
> Though, surely, this one could be somewhat adjusted so that it really
> doesn't use a temporary buffer but reads directly into the initially
> malloced, then realloced, buffer. But, if we want it to eventually switch
> to caching the caret diagnostics, it won't be possible/desirable anymore.
>
> Jakub

gcov.c and input.c currently both have a static function "read_line"
they are currently 100% in sync. Both _can_ fail, if the file gets
deleted or modified while the function executes.

If gcov.c crashes in that event, I'd call it a bug.

Bernd. 		 	   		  

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-04 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-31 14:48 Bernd Edlinger
2013-10-31 15:06 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-10-31 15:19   ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-10-31 18:26     ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-11-04 11:52       ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-04 11:59         ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-11-04 15:42           ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-05  0:10             ` Bernd Edlinger
2013-11-05  9:50               ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-05 11:19                 ` Bernd Edlinger
2013-11-05 11:43                   ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-06 22:27                 ` Bernd Edlinger
2013-11-04 12:06         ` Bernd Edlinger
2013-11-04 12:15           ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-11-04 12:32             ` Bernd Edlinger [this message]
2013-11-04 15:21           ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-11 10:49       ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-11 14:35         ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-11-11 17:13           ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-12 16:42             ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-13  5:10               ` Bernd Edlinger
2013-11-13  9:40                 ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-13  9:43                   ` Bernd Edlinger
2013-11-13  9:49                     ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-13  9:49                     ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-13  9:51               ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-11-14 15:12                 ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-12-09 20:11                   ` Tom Tromey
2014-01-21 12:28                   ` Bernd Edlinger
2014-01-22  8:16                     ` Dodji Seketeli
2014-01-23 17:12                       ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-01-24  2:58                         ` Bernd Edlinger
2014-01-24  7:53                         ` Dodji Seketeli
2014-01-24 15:05                       ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-01-24 15:41                         ` Dodji Seketeli
2014-01-24 15:44                           ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-01-24 16:09                             ` Dodji Seketeli
2014-01-24 16:13                               ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-01-24 23:02                               ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-01-24 23:20                                 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-01-28 13:20                                   ` Dodji Seketeli
2014-01-28 13:23                                     ` Dodji Seketeli
2014-01-28 18:40                                       ` H.J. Lu
2014-01-29 11:28                                         ` Dodji Seketeli
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-10-31 13:45 Dodji Seketeli
2013-10-31 17:30 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DUB122-W7FF5D62CA458FD7931EA9E4F60@phx.gbl \
    --to=bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de \
    --cc=dodji@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).