public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 钟居哲 <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
To: rguenther <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	 "Jeff Law" <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH V2] test: Fix FAIL of pr97428.c for RVV
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 23:20:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E177D434970A1559+202311072320406842987@rivai.ai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YFH.7.77.849.2311071350010.8772@jbgna.fhfr.qr>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2140 bytes --]

Yes! Thanks a lot.

Fix as you suggested in V3:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/635591.html 




juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
 
From: Richard Biener
Date: 2023-11-07 21:50
To: Juzhe-Zhong
CC: gcc-patches; jeffreyalaw
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] test: Fix FAIL of pr97428.c for RVV
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
 
> This test shows vectorizing stmts using SLP 4 times instead of 2 for RVV.
> The reason is RVV has 512 bit vector.
> Here is comparison between RVV ans ARM SVE:
> https://godbolt.org/z/xc5KE5rPs
> 
> Confirm GCN also matches 4 SLP. This patch is passed on both GCN and RVV.
> 
> Ok for trunk ?
 
Does --param vect-epilogues-nomask=0 help?
 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
> * gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c: Adapt for RVV and GCN.
> 
> ---
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c
> index ad6416096aa..f77adb1be97 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c
> @@ -43,5 +43,6 @@ void foo_i2(dcmlx4_t dst[], const dcmlx_t src[], int n)
>  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Detected interleaving store of size 16" "vect" } } */
>  /* We're not able to peel & apply re-aligning to make accesses well-aligned for !vect_hw_misalign,
>     but we could by peeling the stores for alignment and applying re-aligning loads.  */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 2 "vect" { xfail { ! vect_hw_misalign } } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 2 "vect" { target { { vect_hw_misalign } && { ! vect512 } } } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 4 "vect" { target { vect512 } } } } */
>  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "gap of 6 elements" "vect" } } */
> 
 
-- 
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)
 

      reply	other threads:[~2023-11-07 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-07 12:09 Juzhe-Zhong
2023-11-07 13:50 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-07 15:20   ` 钟居哲 [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E177D434970A1559+202311072320406842987@rivai.ai \
    --to=juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).