public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,Bernd Edlinger
	<bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,Jason Merrill
	<jason@redhat.com>,"Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr>; Jakub
	Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>; Jonathan Wakely"
	<jwakely@redhat.com>,Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a new type attribute always_alias (PR79671)
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 15:20:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E33F8D97-47E5-4836-8633-D44406BDF10A@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170405132832.GS17461@tucnak>

On April 5, 2017 3:28:32 PM GMT+02:00, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 09:46:09AM +0000, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> this is related to the P1 codegen bug PR79671:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
>> 
>> Therefore I would like to add this now although
>> the trunk is already at in stage 4.
>> 
>> I propose to add a new type attribute always_alias that
>> works like may_alias but unlike may_alias it should
>> also make instances alias anything.  It is also exposed
>> in C/C++ as __attribute__((always_alias)).
>
>I have just two small comments, for review IMHO want agreement
>between Jason and Richard on this.
>
>One thing is whether it is a good idea to keep this info in the IL
>as an attribute, especially when you add it automatically in the
>C++ FE.  I see e.g. 25 spare bits in tree_type_common.  Don't say we
>need to waste them, but I'd say in C++ unsigned char arrays are fairly
>common and thus not having to create the attribute for them each time
>and look it up might be beneficial.

Agreed.

>Also, wonder if you need to mark all types containing such arrays,
>if you couldn't just set that flag in C++ on unsigned char/std::byte
>arrays (and on anything with that attribute), have that imply alias set
>0 on it and then let the rest of alias machinery handle aggregate types
>containing such fields.

Yes, I expected it to work like this (didn't look at the patch yet).

Richard.

>	Jakub

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-05 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-05  9:46 Bernd Edlinger
2017-04-05 13:28 ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-04-05 15:20   ` Richard Biener [this message]
2017-04-05 17:41     ` Bernd Edlinger
2017-04-05 20:18       ` Jason Merrill
2017-04-05 20:46         ` Bernd Edlinger
2017-04-05 22:54           ` Pedro Alves
2017-04-06 10:08           ` Jonathan Wakely
2017-04-06  7:23         ` Richard Biener
2017-04-05 15:27   ` Bernd Edlinger
2017-04-05 15:29     ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-04-05 14:50 ` Florian Weimer
2017-04-05 15:23   ` Richard Biener
2017-04-05 15:38     ` Bernd Edlinger
2017-04-05 16:03       ` Jonathan Wakely
2017-04-05 16:08         ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-04-05 17:23           ` Bernd Edlinger
2017-04-05 21:02             ` Bernd Edlinger
2017-04-05 23:17               ` Sandra Loosemore
2017-04-06  5:40                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-04-06  7:47               ` Richard Biener
2017-04-06  7:51                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-04-06  7:55                   ` Richard Biener
2017-04-06 14:11                     ` Bernd Edlinger
2017-04-06 14:17                       ` Florian Weimer
2017-04-06 14:23                         ` Richard Biener
2017-04-06 14:43                           ` Jonathan Wakely
2017-04-06 14:51                             ` Florian Weimer
2017-04-06 15:05                               ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-04-06 15:10                                 ` Florian Weimer
2017-04-06 19:13                               ` Richard Biener
2017-04-11 10:43                                 ` Florian Weimer
2017-04-11 10:48                                   ` Richard Biener
2017-04-06 17:39                         ` Bernd Edlinger
2017-04-06 17:48                           ` Florian Weimer
2017-04-06 18:12                             ` Bernd Edlinger
2017-04-06 18:19                               ` Florian Weimer
2017-04-06 18:49                                 ` Bernd Edlinger
2017-04-06 19:05                                   ` Florian Weimer
2017-04-06 19:20                                     ` Bernd Edlinger
2017-04-07  6:47                                       ` Richard Biener
2017-04-07 12:58                                         ` Bernd Edlinger
2017-04-06 19:16                               ` Richard Biener
2017-04-07  6:56                                 ` Florian Weimer
2017-04-07  8:01                                   ` Richard Biener
2017-04-06 19:14                           ` Richard Biener
2017-04-06 19:51                             ` Bernd Edlinger
2017-04-06 14:22                       ` Richard Biener
2017-04-06 21:00                 ` Bernd Edlinger
2017-04-07  6:54                   ` Richard Biener
2017-04-07 13:37                     ` Bernd Edlinger
2017-04-07 15:10                       ` Richard Biener
2017-04-07 15:33                         ` Bernd Edlinger
2017-04-07 20:22                           ` Jason Merrill
2017-04-10 12:50                             ` Richard Biener
2017-04-10 14:41                               ` Jason Merrill
2017-04-10 15:31                                 ` Richard Biener
2017-04-10 16:35                                   ` Jason Merrill
2017-04-11 10:32                                     ` Richard Biener
2017-04-11 11:53                                       ` Richard Biener
2017-04-11 13:35                                         ` Richard Biener
2017-04-11 18:47                                           ` Jason Merrill
2017-04-10 21:40                               ` Pedro Alves
2017-04-11  7:37                                 ` Richard Biener
2017-04-06 20:20               ` Bernd Edlinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E33F8D97-47E5-4836-8633-D44406BDF10A@suse.de \
    --to=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=jwakely@redhat.com \
    --cc=law@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).