From: Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Rework option -mpowerpc64 handling [PR106680]
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 19:33:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E5508A9F-20BE-4031-9A55-5D2845497705@sandoe.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220929171858.GZ25951@gate.crashing.org>
Hi Segher
> On 29 Sep 2022, at 18:18, Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 12:04:05AM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>> On 28 Sep 2022, at 22:30, Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>>> That works on Linux as well. What still does not work is user-mode
>>> context switches in 32-bit processes (so setjmp and getcontext stuff).
>>
>> AFAIU the Darwin impl. it is the same - the user context only contains 32b
>> register images.
>
> Huh, I thought Darwin did this properly.
>
>> Since one can only use the feature between function calls,
>
> You still have to preserve the non-volatile GPRs. All 64 bits of it.
The OS does do that - e.g. on an interrupt .. but AFAIR, the user-visible mcontext
in a 32b process only shows the lower 32 bits.
( i’d better stop making too many assertions here from memory, ;) )
>> I guess that the
>> setjmp/longjmp stuff is not so critical on Darwin***. However, even being able
>> to use 64b insns between calls could give a massive win in allowing, for
>> example, lock-free 64b atomics.
>
> But that is not how GCC with -mpowerpc64 works: the calling convention
> is the usual 32-bit one, but the functions are 64-bit otherwise; it uses
> all 64 bits of GPRs everywhere except in function calls.
I think we said the same thing with different words.
The CC is unchanged (so that we can only use 64b insns between calls, since
the upper 32b of callee-saved regs are not preserved).
cheers
Iain
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-29 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-28 5:30 Kewen.Lin
2022-09-28 6:37 ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-28 16:18 ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-28 19:09 ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-29 5:45 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-09-29 8:16 ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-29 9:12 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-09-29 16:14 ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-29 17:04 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-29 18:25 ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-29 18:37 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-30 9:26 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-09-29 17:11 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-30 12:15 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-10-03 21:15 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-10-10 2:15 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-10-10 13:58 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-10-12 8:26 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-09-28 21:30 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-28 23:04 ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-28 23:16 ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-29 17:26 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-29 17:18 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-29 18:33 ` Iain Sandoe [this message]
2022-09-29 18:50 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-28 22:04 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-29 6:16 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-09-29 18:56 ` Segher Boessenkool
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E5508A9F-20BE-4031-9A55-5D2845497705@sandoe.co.uk \
--to=iain@sandoe.co.uk \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).