From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32736 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2015 12:04:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32726 invoked by uid 89); 5 Jun 2015 12:04:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp.eu.adacore.com Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO smtp.eu.adacore.com) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 12:04:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87146285321A; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 14:04:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.eu.adacore.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id teNATGR1Op5a; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 14:04:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (bot35-1-88-189-246-115.fbx.proxad.net [88.189.246.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35164285279A; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 14:04:37 +0200 (CEST) References: <5568E37B.3050401@marino.st> <20777268.lEEs1vboLO@polaris> <20150603073036.GA10341@adacore.com> <556EB67B.5010704@marino.st> <20150603090358.GB28561@adacore.com> <55708F24.70704@marino.st> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <55708F24.70704@marino.st> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Cc: Eric Botcazou , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Thomas Quinot From: Arnaud Charlet Subject: Re: [patch] Implement Ada support for DragonFly, improve it for FreeBSD Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 13:08:00 -0000 To: John Marino X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00460.txt.bz2 Patch is OK. Arno >>> Is a new submission necessary or can this be handled by committer? >> Preferably yes. >>> A new submission will take me a few days because I'm traveling ATM. > > There was a significant amount of bitrot. Apparently right after I > submitted the patch, many macros were adjusted by Adacore hitting the > same files and copyrights as I did. I updated the patch set by hand and > tested it against the 31 may snapshot. I also fixed the > TOOLS_TARGET_PAIRS issue of course. same URL: > > http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~marino/freebsd/gnat-dragonfly-support.diff > > I also updated the suggested commit message as Eric suggested: > > http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~marino/freebsd/gnat-dragonfly-support.msg.txt > > Hopefully this patch isn't already bitrotted! > > John >