From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 111133 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2017 19:36:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 111121 invoked by uid 89); 22 Apr 2017 19:36:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=hate X-HELO: resqmta-po-05v.sys.comcast.net Received: from resqmta-po-05v.sys.comcast.net (HELO resqmta-po-05v.sys.comcast.net) (96.114.154.164) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 19:36:41 +0000 Received: from resomta-po-19v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.243]) by resqmta-po-05v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id 20pcdZwkIrWIE20pld0NYA; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 19:36:41 +0000 Received: from up.mrs.kithrup.com ([24.4.193.248]) by resomta-po-19v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id 20pkdnpl7iVxk20pkdE2Zv; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 19:36:41 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: [RFC, testsuite] Add dg-save-linenr From: Mike Stump In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:58:00 -0000 Cc: Rainer Orth , GCC Patches , Jakub Jelinek Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Tom de Vries X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfJzkhAi3fDbck+lUwjpDdur0S4q3X8HfP3+CNZ/UreBCDwgVxDOjMpE2QtcYGwkacLeuy9OuV2Ubwud1khtVq/YPVXO3gt3XTToOnmUMWGrWhbUQln+l piHZUykCO8yg43TA6m7k1veEGFdFNpR6QGfdPTNESswLFC8+2R4h/pUSISzdvmA4EsOTUCad5jVMkiewfrDzbVZIdMedKz9I+3+pClV5yETKgfsQRujzxmvi GbCcFndwrU/7Ct/oNkNfXsT382BcT7tLfvxPo2IWUMNXezwf4Dohv3nsJuluefVO X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-04/txt/msg00976.txt.bz2 On Apr 22, 2017, at 10:49 AM, Tom de Vries wrote: >=20 > This patch adds a directive dg-save-linenr with argument varname, that sa= ves the line number of the directive in a variable varname, which can be us= ed as line number in dg directives. > RFC: > - good idea? Seems reasonable to me. I'd like to encourage, like it, hate it comments f= rom others and see what others think.