From: "juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai" <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
To: rguenther <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
richard.sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>,
linkw <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH V4] VECT: Support loop len control on EXTRACT_LAST vectorization
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 15:09:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E84C0A5698002C79+202308141509035185926@rivai.ai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YFH.7.77.849.2308140653280.12935@jbgna.fhfr.qr>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7263 bytes --]
Thanks Richi.
CC kewen to see whether this patch is suitable for powerpc and s390.
juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
From: Richard Biener
Date: 2023-08-14 14:53
To: Ju-Zhe Zhong
CC: gcc-patches; richard.sandiford
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] VECT: Support loop len control on EXTRACT_LAST vectorization
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023, juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai wrote:
> From: Ju-Zhe Zhong <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
>
> Hi, Richard and Richi.
>
> This patch add support live vectorization by VEC_EXTRACT for LEN loop control.
OK.
Thanks,
Richard.
> Consider this following case:
>
> #include <stdint.h>
>
> #define EXTRACT_LAST(TYPE) \
> TYPE __attribute__ ((noinline, noclone)) \
> test_##TYPE (TYPE *x, int n, TYPE value) \
> { \
> TYPE last; \
> for (int j = 0; j < n; ++j) \
> { \
> last = x[j]; \
> x[j] = last * value; \
> } \
> return last; \
> }
>
> #define TEST_ALL(T) \
> T (uint8_t) \
>
> TEST_ALL (EXTRACT_LAST)
>
> ARM SVE IR:
>
> Preheader:
> max_mask_34 = .WHILE_ULT (0, bnd.5_6, { 0, ... });
>
> Loop:
> ...
> # loop_mask_22 = PHI <next_mask_35(4), max_mask_34(3)>
> ...
> vect_last_12.8_23 = .MASK_LOAD (_7, 8B, loop_mask_22);
> vect__4.9_27 = vect_last_12.8_23 * vect_cst__26;
> .MASK_STORE (_7, 8B, loop_mask_22, vect__4.9_27);
> ...
> next_mask_35 = .WHILE_ULT (_1, bnd.5_6, { 0, ... });
> ...
>
> Epilogue:
> _25 = .EXTRACT_LAST (loop_mask_22, vect_last_12.8_23);
>
> For RVV since we prefer len in loop control, after this patch for RVV:
>
> Loop:
> ...
> loop_len_22 = SELECT_VL;
> vect_last_12.8_23 = .MASK_LOAD (_7, 8B, loop_len_22);
> vect__4.9_27 = vect_last_12.8_23 * vect_cst__26;
> .MASK_STORE (_7, 8B, loop_len_22, vect__4.9_27);
> ...
>
> Epilogue:
> _25 = .VEC_EXTRACT (loop_len_22 + bias - 1, vect_last_12.8_23);
>
> Details of this approach:
>
> 1. Step 1 - Add 'vect_can_vectorize_extract_last_with_len_p' to enable live vectorization
> for LEN loop control.
>
> This function we check whether target support:
> - Use LEN as the loop control.
> - Support VEC_EXTRACT optab.
>
> 2. Step 2 - Record LEN for loop control if 'vect_can_vectorize_extract_last_with_len_p' is true.
>
> 3. Step 3 - Gerenate VEC_EXTRACT (v, LEN + BIAS - 1).
>
> The only difference between mask and len is that len is using length generated by SELECT_VL and
> use VEC_EXTRACT pattern. The rest of the live vectorization is totally the same ARM SVE.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * tree-vect-loop.cc (vectorizable_live_operation): Add loop len control.
>
> ---
> gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
> index bf8d677b584..a011e2dacb2 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
> @@ -10278,17 +10278,7 @@ vectorizable_live_operation (vec_info *vinfo, stmt_vec_info stmt_info,
> /* No transformation required. */
> if (loop_vinfo && LOOP_VINFO_CAN_USE_PARTIAL_VECTORS_P (loop_vinfo))
> {
> - if (!direct_internal_fn_supported_p (IFN_EXTRACT_LAST, vectype,
> - OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED))
> - {
> - if (dump_enabled_p ())
> - dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location,
> - "can't operate on partial vectors "
> - "because the target doesn't support extract "
> - "last reduction.\n");
> - LOOP_VINFO_CAN_USE_PARTIAL_VECTORS_P (loop_vinfo) = false;
> - }
> - else if (slp_node)
> + if (slp_node)
> {
> if (dump_enabled_p ())
> dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location,
> @@ -10308,9 +10298,28 @@ vectorizable_live_operation (vec_info *vinfo, stmt_vec_info stmt_info,
> else
> {
> gcc_assert (ncopies == 1 && !slp_node);
> - vect_record_loop_mask (loop_vinfo,
> - &LOOP_VINFO_MASKS (loop_vinfo),
> - 1, vectype, NULL);
> + if (direct_internal_fn_supported_p (IFN_EXTRACT_LAST, vectype,
> + OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED))
> + vect_record_loop_mask (loop_vinfo,
> + &LOOP_VINFO_MASKS (loop_vinfo),
> + 1, vectype, NULL);
> + else if (convert_optab_handler (vec_extract_optab,
> + TYPE_MODE (vectype),
> + TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (vectype)))
> + != CODE_FOR_nothing)
> + vect_record_loop_len (loop_vinfo,
> + &LOOP_VINFO_LENS (loop_vinfo),
> + 1, vectype, 1);
> + else
> + {
> + if (dump_enabled_p ())
> + dump_printf_loc (
> + MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location,
> + "can't operate on partial vectors "
> + "because the target doesn't support extract "
> + "last reduction.\n");
> + LOOP_VINFO_CAN_USE_PARTIAL_VECTORS_P (loop_vinfo) = false;
> + }
> }
> }
> /* ??? Enable for loop costing as well. */
> @@ -10336,7 +10345,9 @@ vectorizable_live_operation (vec_info *vinfo, stmt_vec_info stmt_info,
> gimple *vec_stmt;
> if (slp_node)
> {
> - gcc_assert (!loop_vinfo || !LOOP_VINFO_FULLY_MASKED_P (loop_vinfo));
> + gcc_assert (!loop_vinfo
> + || (!LOOP_VINFO_FULLY_MASKED_P (loop_vinfo)
> + && !LOOP_VINFO_FULLY_WITH_LENGTH_P (loop_vinfo)));
>
> /* Get the correct slp vectorized stmt. */
> vec_lhs = SLP_TREE_VEC_DEFS (slp_node)[vec_entry];
> @@ -10380,7 +10391,42 @@ vectorizable_live_operation (vec_info *vinfo, stmt_vec_info stmt_info,
>
> gimple_seq stmts = NULL;
> tree new_tree;
> - if (LOOP_VINFO_FULLY_MASKED_P (loop_vinfo))
> + if (LOOP_VINFO_FULLY_WITH_LENGTH_P (loop_vinfo))
> + {
> + /* Emit:
> +
> + SCALAR_RES = VEC_EXTRACT <VEC_LHS, LEN + BIAS - 1>
> +
> + where VEC_LHS is the vectorized live-out result and MASK is
> + the loop mask for the final iteration. */
> + gcc_assert (ncopies == 1 && !slp_node);
> + gimple_seq tem = NULL;
> + gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_last (tem);
> + tree len
> + = vect_get_loop_len (loop_vinfo, &gsi,
> + &LOOP_VINFO_LENS (loop_vinfo),
> + 1, vectype, 0, 0);
> +
> + /* BIAS - 1. */
> + signed char biasval = LOOP_VINFO_PARTIAL_LOAD_STORE_BIAS (loop_vinfo);
> + tree bias_minus_one
> + = int_const_binop (MINUS_EXPR,
> + build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (len), biasval),
> + build_one_cst (TREE_TYPE (len)));
> +
> + /* LAST_INDEX = LEN + (BIAS - 1). */
> + tree last_index = gimple_build (&stmts, PLUS_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (len),
> + len, bias_minus_one);
> +
> + /* SCALAR_RES = VEC_EXTRACT <VEC_LHS, LEN + BIAS - 1>. */
> + tree scalar_res
> + = gimple_build (&stmts, CFN_VEC_EXTRACT, TREE_TYPE (vectype),
> + vec_lhs_phi, last_index);
> +
> + /* Convert the extracted vector element to the scalar type. */
> + new_tree = gimple_convert (&stmts, lhs_type, scalar_res);
> + }
> + else if (LOOP_VINFO_FULLY_MASKED_P (loop_vinfo))
> {
> /* Emit:
>
>
--
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-14 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-11 14:24 juzhe.zhong
2023-08-14 6:53 ` Richard Biener
2023-08-14 7:09 ` juzhe.zhong [this message]
2023-08-14 8:51 ` Kewen.Lin
2023-08-14 8:58 ` Robin Dapp
2023-08-14 9:15 ` Richard Biener
2023-08-14 9:19 ` Kewen.Lin
2023-08-14 9:26 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-08-14 12:07 ` Richard Biener
2023-08-14 12:08 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-08-14 12:45 ` Kewen.Lin
2023-08-14 13:28 ` 钟居哲
2023-08-14 13:44 ` Richard Biener
2023-08-14 18:51 ` Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
2023-08-15 6:25 ` Kewen.Lin
2023-08-15 6:58 ` Richard Biener
2023-08-15 8:52 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-08-15 8:55 ` Richard Biener
2023-08-15 9:05 ` Richard Sandiford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E84C0A5698002C79+202308141509035185926@rivai.ai \
--to=juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).