From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 116336 invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2016 17:06:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 116320 invoked by uid 89); 13 Sep 2016 17:06:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=amazed, H*MI:sk:D85pF8s, H*MI:sk:3698532, H*f:sk:3698532 X-HELO: resqmta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net Received: from resqmta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net (HELO resqmta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net) (96.114.154.161) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:06:55 +0000 Received: from resomta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.230]) by resqmta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id jrAFbq07f1zBdjrAcbK3Ir; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:06:54 +0000 Received: from up.mrs.kithrup.com ([24.4.193.248]) by resomta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id jrAabkp5kvuA4jrAbbvTmw; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:06:53 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Put a TARGET_LRA_P into every target From: Mike Stump In-Reply-To: <3698532b-9941-fa70-a60d-e63a06e3cef0@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:08:00 -0000 Cc: Peter Bergner , Andrew Pinski , Segher Boessenkool , Bernd Schmidt , GCC Patches Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20160913110349.GA18438@gate.crashing.org> <3698532b-9941-fa70-a60d-e63a06e3cef0@redhat.com> To: Jeff Law X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfNzV14bD9nxpSQhwm9g3xlpkP2Ljz45V3qF7UZwUEDau6/lcygzcjnZkaQzEtZlr3JAFESO8vxifZ/LLnNZrnpiBfbJ0up2RKyosoXb95jMMHEe1ZVxv ed+LZQKsydA0sB3cMRu0wFNkZv/8GRdZvWW0pgHFSSbBAdLouylC8Zq9p6U/cPX4HyPBT3b+nOtHMjWnjT89C6aaw7Yb3vdV/4x40x0aQb/bhbUELNgL3hSi 2GBNksk02exRnidPsYgVDEDVbO5bBueWk8Fegri6g6L1Ws2BGPTVwgKf72neaU/+w2lN5zEf/bEv4rW52TfOs44NsX1JFuWiwaMPJSErqdY= X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00757.txt.bz2 On Sep 13, 2016, at 9:07 AM, Jeff Law wrote: >=20 > On 09/13/2016 09:45 AM, Peter Bergner wrote: >> On 9/13/16 9:26 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Segher Boessenkool >>>> And all new ports should use LRA, so it should be the default. >>>=20 >>> I am going to say yes please. This patch in my mind is the right way >>> forward. >>=20 >> + 1! >>=20 >> should be LRA from day 1 for them. > Right. We want ports to start development using LRA from day 1. As the author of a few new ports, let me say that I have wanted the LRA def= ault for a while now. I was amazed that this wasn't already the case. I p= ersonally favor the patch series.