From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from resqmta-h1p-028595.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-h1p-028595.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fd02:2446::3]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEE0C38582A1 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 18:42:48 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org BEE0C38582A1 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=comcast.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=comcast.net Received: from resomta-h1p-028509.sys.comcast.net ([96.102.179.194]) by resqmta-h1p-028595.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id Farupc9ZZwIZgFg3jpLtZ2; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 18:42:47 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=20190202a; t=1673462567; bh=Bm9wy42Ed+JHsdM3QtDM0dFskpPO0XLwUx7vIuLK+Vk=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date: Message-Id:To:Xfinity-Spam-Result; b=Npda6kdJ2PFGxg3vy1SZDvmahEBLsOoekaZOZeh+x9+L8EFnHjnmtLaNFqdRCwTf2 bDsg9sISC2lWCHlaNZormHcF9Lj1Cfyb+nbs6BZmTAWdhG2HPLIWNw+8STAwip6ARj WWfQg0g2ab1/GqGlrH5sN/jHt+uyXAeHSs2ZajiLZoR9rEzDdVbFwxtSJTNILFKjwq mylqIFtRqdr1KILD9uu4jgBKrCJUFmjdC3yBUXlcFYOM+T3N41D+lW/0584Bc5GeFQ Es/ItKuujtVgYitAZ2o0f6vZGsHiduyHV2dauq9ztLV2xU7AyHyuIe0s2+0mGNEn5M odUkpQxnIcyAw== Received: from smtpclient.apple ([73.60.223.101]) by resomta-h1p-028509.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPSA id Fg3Kpnpq8BapUFg3MpuBCR; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 18:42:25 +0000 X-Xfinity-VAAS: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrleeggdduudehucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuvehomhgtrghsthdqtfgvshhipdfqfgfvpdfpqffurfetoffkrfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurheptggguffhjgffvefgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpefrrghulhcumfhonhhinhhguceophgruhhlkhhonhhinhhgsegtohhmtggrshhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvvefhteejgeetjeeuueeugeeludejfefhhffftdevheevheevueelhfejgedujeenucffohhmrghinhephhhtmhhlrdhinhenucfkphepjeefrdeitddrvddvfedruddtudenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopehsmhhtphgtlhhivghnthdrrghpphhlvgdpihhnvghtpeejfedriedtrddvvdefrddutddupdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepphgruhhlkhhonhhinhhgsegtohhmtggrshhtrdhnvghtpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeegpdhrtghpthhtohepshgvghhhvghrsehkvghrnhgvlhdrtghrrghshhhinhhgrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheprhhitghhrghrugdrghhuvghnthhhvghrsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghgvrhgrlhgusehpfhgvihhfvghrrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghgttgdqphgrthgthhgvshesghgttgdrghhnuhdrohhrgh X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=-100.00;st=legit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: Note that old reload is deprecated From: Paul Koning In-Reply-To: <20230111183251.GV25951@gate.crashing.org> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 13:42:22 -0500 Cc: Richard Biener , Gerald Pfeifer , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20230111151520.GU25951@gate.crashing.org> <20230111183251.GV25951@gate.crashing.org> To: Segher Boessenkool X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > On Jan 11, 2023, at 1:32 PM, Segher Boessenkool = wrote: >=20 > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 05:27:36PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: >>> Am 11.01.2023 um 16:17 schrieb Segher Boessenkool = : >>>> Note this is more info for port maintainers not for users and >>>> changes.html is for users. >>>=20 >>> And users will notice some ports will have to be removed, because = those >>> ports are not maintained / not maintained enough. Some ports will = not >>> work with LRA, most will be easy to fix, but someone will have to do >>> that. If no one does so the port works sufficiently well it will = have >>> to be removed before release. >>>=20 >>>> "In a future release" is also quite vague. >>>=20 >>> It's what we usually say in changes.html . "In GCC 14" if you want? >>>=20 >>> I can add some stuff on how this will benefit users? >>=20 >> I guess listing the ports without LRA support might be a first step = for clarification? >=20 > Every port has LRA support. >=20 > Some ports will not build later when we delete old reload, because = they > use some functions and/or data structures unique to that. Or, as in my case, because building with LRA as the default triggers an = ICE that I don't understand. I posted a note to the GCC list about what = I saw, but have received no reaction. If anyone can help me understand how LRA can generate RTL with register = choices that violate the constraints listed in the MD file, I would be = grateful. paul