From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com (mail-wr1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::433]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2075E3858C20 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 06:06:33 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 2075E3858C20 Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id z13so14440101wro.13 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2022 23:06:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=a5lJkC2V0JX/Q8L59yGtrsUfc3jPZbzFamsoF3QAa5I=; b=YO9NjRyHmxKUHGED/8aZets1nB6aQFkqONqcvAD0XnbxDK45TxF2QBl7ld6KzyODy4 FfZJEUbczjM2c6l7/XE1DQ/7W98+afv8V8R4byO9kr6pwpIwflOukTx6mGh9SyOmsdp0 RrcQzHUeqRBS27jLVqnsK4ZNCd88Pf/h2Oh3XZPsvSuUcxaps1AyPKKs46mAsqFdwEBZ wvL0XrJKAqrTNT2xuaf1APbSGP8HOmTqHL2A7aXw01h0Q38h2Q6UCuc6nrDXGJAjGzRW zEXSWZNjv/cB1P/oBNKg3g4NzNRPCaX6ym7XIv5ShDRfwIzT1aubdNFoTJKckEZefCV7 OuaA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+SFTdpTaadfNz/3PdEKBahcnbdsZxrimzlnL5DOaHGIfiU2/7K xb8WkA49Ra/6mxZUvXzzlEE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vEIc0cDBPiXJXcZod6Y3Q6nMBkdIv2JBnzlDxn3HQasQ9UWfoMlShBY9n7km9+CFM1obfDfg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:460a:0:b0:21e:4fa4:194a with SMTP id t10-20020a5d460a000000b0021e4fa4194amr6664346wrq.10.1658729191851; Sun, 24 Jul 2022 23:06:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.95] (host81-138-1-83.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [81.138.1.83]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id ib13-20020a05600ca14d00b003a31ba538c2sm12830050wmb.40.2022.07.24.23.06.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 24 Jul 2022 23:06:30 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Allow subtarget customization of CC1_SPEC From: Iain Sandoe In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 07:06:30 +0100 Cc: "Jose E. Marchesi" , GCC Patches , Joseph Myers Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20220722130250.59766-1-sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de> <87bkth454k.fsf@oracle.com> To: Sebastian Huber X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 06:06:34 -0000 Hi Sebastian, > On 25 Jul 2022, at 06:59, Sebastian Huber = wrote: > On 22/07/2022 16:02, Jose E. Marchesi wrote: >> I find "subtarget" confusing in this context. >> If it is about rtems.h, linux.h or sol2.h, wouldn't this be better >> called OS_CC1_SPEC or similar? These files specify configurations = that >> apply to a set of targets, not to a subset of a target... >=20 > Iain Sandoe told me that for the GCC implementation the OSs are = sub-targets of the architecture: >=20 > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2022-July/239158.html There is, however, a precedent for the SUBTARGET_ use, however, I agree = with Jose that it is somewhat confusing - since (as mentioned before) to = the OS the arches are the sub-targets, so maybe OS_xxx would be more = clear. Perhaps Joseph (CC-d) would weigh in here. Iain