From: Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com>
To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>
Cc: Joseph Myers <josmyers@redhat.com>,
"richard.guenther@gmail.com" <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
"uecker@tugraz.at" <uecker@tugraz.at>,
"keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"isanbard@gmail.com" <isanbard@gmail.com>,
"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] Use the .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE in builtin object size.
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 16:36:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F7633BA7-DC1F-4EE1-A7E9-3E309CECB6A0@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0ab02eb8-c749-418c-9a81-596a91b4ed0f@gotplt.org>
> On Mar 18, 2024, at 12:30, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org> wrote:
>
> On 2024-03-18 12:28, Qing Zhao wrote:
>>>> This should probably bail out if object_size_type & OST_DYNAMIC == 0.
>>> Okay. Will add this.
>> When add this into access_with_size_object_size, I found some old bugs in early_object_sizes_execute_one, and fixed them as well.
>
> Would you be able to isolate this fix and post them separately? I reckon they would be relevant for gcc 14 too.
Yes, that’s a good idea, I can do that.
No specific testing case for it, though.
thanks.
Qing
>
> Thanks,
> Sid
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-18 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-16 19:47 [PATCH v6 0/5]New attribute "counted_by" to annotate bounds for C99 FAM(PR108896) Qing Zhao
2024-02-16 19:47 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] Provide counted_by attribute to flexible array member field (PR108896) Qing Zhao
2024-03-11 14:57 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2024-03-13 17:57 ` Qing Zhao
2024-02-16 19:47 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] Convert references with "counted_by" attributes to/from .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE Qing Zhao
2024-03-11 17:09 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2024-03-13 19:06 ` Qing Zhao
2024-02-16 19:47 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] Use the .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE in builtin object size Qing Zhao
2024-03-11 17:11 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2024-03-13 19:17 ` Qing Zhao
2024-03-18 16:28 ` Qing Zhao
2024-03-18 16:30 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2024-03-18 16:36 ` Qing Zhao [this message]
2024-02-16 19:47 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] Use the .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE in bound sanitizer Qing Zhao
2024-03-11 17:15 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2024-03-13 19:19 ` Qing Zhao
2024-03-15 14:29 ` Qing Zhao
2024-02-16 19:47 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] Add the 6th argument to .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE Qing Zhao
2024-02-16 21:39 ` [PATCH v6 0/5]New attribute "counted_by" to annotate bounds for C99 FAM(PR108896) Kees Cook
2024-03-01 14:38 ` Qing Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=F7633BA7-DC1F-4EE1-A7E9-3E309CECB6A0@oracle.com \
--to=qing.zhao@oracle.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=isanbard@gmail.com \
--cc=josmyers@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
--cc=uecker@tugraz.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).