public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com>
To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>
Cc: Joseph Myers <josmyers@redhat.com>,
	"richard.guenther@gmail.com" <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
	"uecker@tugraz.at" <uecker@tugraz.at>,
	"keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"isanbard@gmail.com" <isanbard@gmail.com>,
	"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] Use the .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE in bound sanitizer.
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:19:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <F9E33202-8250-4D0C-9A9D-3924AB067964@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fdc9ba8d-0898-426d-908c-4875a8975e74@gotplt.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7922 bytes --]



On Mar 11, 2024, at 13:15, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org> wrote:



On 2024-02-16 14:47, Qing Zhao wrote:
gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
* c-ubsan.cc (get_bound_from_access_with_size): New function.
(ubsan_instrument_bounds): Handle call to .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/ubsan/flex-array-counted-by-bounds-2.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/ubsan/flex-array-counted-by-bounds-3.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/ubsan/flex-array-counted-by-bounds.c: New test.
---
 gcc/c-family/c-ubsan.cc                       | 42 +++++++++++++++++
 .../ubsan/flex-array-counted-by-bounds-2.c    | 45 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../ubsan/flex-array-counted-by-bounds-3.c    | 34 ++++++++++++++
 .../ubsan/flex-array-counted-by-bounds.c      | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 167 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ubsan/flex-array-counted-by-bounds-2.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ubsan/flex-array-counted-by-bounds-3.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ubsan/flex-array-counted-by-bounds.c
diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-ubsan.cc b/gcc/c-family/c-ubsan.cc
index 940982819ddf..164b29845b3a 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/c-ubsan.cc
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c-ubsan.cc
@@ -376,6 +376,40 @@ ubsan_instrument_return (location_t loc)
   return build_call_expr_loc (loc, t, 1, build_fold_addr_expr_loc (loc, data));
 }
 +/* Get the tree that represented the number of counted_by, i.e, the maximum
+   number of the elements of the object that the call to .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE
+   points to, this number will be the bound of the corresponding array.  */
+static tree
+get_bound_from_access_with_size (tree call)
+{
+  if (!is_access_with_size_p (call))
+    return NULL_TREE;
+
+  tree ref_to_size = CALL_EXPR_ARG (call, 1);
+  unsigned int type_of_size = TREE_INT_CST_LOW (CALL_EXPR_ARG (call, 2));

Again for consistency, this should probably be class_of_size.

Okay, I will update this consistently with the change relate to the 3rd argument.

+  tree type = TREE_TYPE (CALL_EXPR_ARG (call, 3));
+  tree size = fold_build2 (MEM_REF, type, unshare_expr (ref_to_size),
+    build_int_cst (ptr_type_node, 0));
+  /* If size is negative value, treat it as zero.  */
+  if (!TYPE_UNSIGNED (type))
+  {
+    tree cond = fold_build2 (LT_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
+      unshare_expr (size), build_zero_cst (type));
+    size = fold_build3 (COND_EXPR, type, cond,
+ build_zero_cst (type), size);
+  }
+
+  /* Only when type_of_size is 1,i.e, the number of the elements of
+     the object type, return the size.  */
+  if (type_of_size != 1)
+    return NULL_TREE;
+  else
+    size = fold_convert (sizetype, size);
+
+  return size;
+}
+
+
 /* Instrument array bounds for ARRAY_REFs.  We create special builtin,
    that gets expanded in the sanopt pass, and make an array dimension
    of it.  ARRAY is the array, *INDEX is an index to the array.
@@ -401,6 +435,14 @@ ubsan_instrument_bounds (location_t loc, tree array, tree *index,
    && COMPLETE_TYPE_P (type)
    && integer_zerop (TYPE_SIZE (type)))
  bound = build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (TYPE_MIN_VALUE (domain)), -1);
+      else if (INDIRECT_REF_P (array)
+        && is_access_with_size_p ((TREE_OPERAND (array, 0))))
+ {
+   bound = get_bound_from_access_with_size ((TREE_OPERAND (array, 0)));
+   bound = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (bound),
+        bound,
+        build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (bound), 1));
+ }

This will wrap if bound == 0, maybe that needs to be special-cased.  And maybe also add a test for it below.

Will check on this to see whether a new testing is needed.

Thanks a lot for the review.

Qing

       else
  return NULL_TREE;
     }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ubsan/flex-array-counted-by-bounds-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ubsan/flex-array-counted-by-bounds-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..148934975ee5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ubsan/flex-array-counted-by-bounds-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+/* test the attribute counted_by and its usage in
+   bounds sanitizer combined with VLA.  */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-fsanitize=bounds" } */
+/* { dg-output "index 11 out of bounds for type 'int \\\[\\\*\\\]\\\[\\\*\\\]'\[^\n\r]*(\n|\r\n|\r)" } */
+/* { dg-output "\[^\n\r]*index 20 out of bounds for type 'int \\\[\\\*\\\]\\\[\\\*\\\]\\\[\\\*\\\]'\[^\n\r]*(\n|\r\n|\r)" } */
+/* { dg-output "\[^\n\r]*index 11 out of bounds for type 'int \\\[\\\*\\\]\\\[\\\*\\\]'\[^\n\r]*(\n|\r\n|\r)" } */
+/* { dg-output "\[^\n\r]*index 10 out of bounds for type 'int \\\[\\\*\\\]'\[^\n\r]*(\n|\r\n|\r)" } */
+
+
+#include <stdlib.h>
+
+void __attribute__((__noinline__)) setup_and_test_vla (int n, int m)
+{
+   struct foo {
+       int n;
+       int p[][n] __attribute__((counted_by(n)));
+   } *f;
+
+   f = (struct foo *) malloc (sizeof(struct foo) + m*sizeof(int[n]));
+   f->n = m;
+   f->p[m][n-1]=1;
+   return;
+}
+
+void __attribute__((__noinline__)) setup_and_test_vla_1 (int n1, int n2, int m)
+{
+  struct foo {
+    int n;
+    int p[][n2][n1] __attribute__((counted_by(n)));
+  } *f;
+
+  f = (struct foo *) malloc (sizeof(struct foo) + m*sizeof(int[n2][n1]));
+  f->n = m;
+  f->p[m][n2][n1]=1;
+  return;
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+  setup_and_test_vla (10, 11);
+  setup_and_test_vla_1 (10, 11, 20);
+  return 0;
+}
+
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ubsan/flex-array-counted-by-bounds-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ubsan/flex-array-counted-by-bounds-3.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..33bdea1c430b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ubsan/flex-array-counted-by-bounds-3.c
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+/* test the attribute counted_by and its usage in bounds
+   sanitizer. when counted_by field is negative value.  */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-fsanitize=bounds" } */
+
+#include <stdlib.h>
+
+struct annotated {
+  int b;
+  int c[] __attribute__ ((counted_by (b)));
+} *array_annotated;
+
+void __attribute__((__noinline__)) setup (int annotated_count)
+{
+  array_annotated
+    = (struct annotated *)malloc (sizeof (struct annotated));
+  array_annotated->b = annotated_count;
+
+  return;
+}
+
+void __attribute__((__noinline__)) test (int annotated_index)
+{
+  array_annotated->c[annotated_index] = 2;
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+  setup (-3);
+  test (2);
+  return 0;
+}
+
+/* { dg-output "24:21: runtime error: index 2 out of bounds for type" } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ubsan/flex-array-counted-by-bounds.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ubsan/flex-array-counted-by-bounds.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..81eaeb3f2681
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ubsan/flex-array-counted-by-bounds.c
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+/* test the attribute counted_by and its usage in
+   bounds sanitizer.  */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-fsanitize=bounds" } */
+
+#include <stdlib.h>
+
+struct flex {
+  int b;
+  int c[];
+} *array_flex;
+
+struct annotated {
+  int b;
+  int c[] __attribute__ ((counted_by (b)));
+} *array_annotated;
+
+void __attribute__((__noinline__)) setup (int normal_count, int annotated_count)
+{
+  array_flex
+    = (struct flex *)malloc (sizeof (struct flex)
+      + normal_count *  sizeof (int));
+  array_flex->b = normal_count;
+
+  array_annotated
+    = (struct annotated *)malloc (sizeof (struct annotated)
+   + annotated_count *  sizeof (int));
+  array_annotated->b = annotated_count;
+
+  return;
+}
+
+void __attribute__((__noinline__)) test (int normal_index, int annotated_index)
+{
+  array_flex->c[normal_index] = 1;
+  array_annotated->c[annotated_index] = 2;
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+  setup (10, 10);
+  test (10, 10);
+  return 0;
+}
+
+/* { dg-output "36:21: runtime error: index 10 out of bounds for type" } */


  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-13 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-16 19:47 [PATCH v6 0/5]New attribute "counted_by" to annotate bounds for C99 FAM(PR108896) Qing Zhao
2024-02-16 19:47 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] Provide counted_by attribute to flexible array member field (PR108896) Qing Zhao
2024-03-11 14:57   ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2024-03-13 17:57     ` Qing Zhao
2024-02-16 19:47 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] Convert references with "counted_by" attributes to/from .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE Qing Zhao
2024-03-11 17:09   ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2024-03-13 19:06     ` Qing Zhao
2024-02-16 19:47 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] Use the .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE in builtin object size Qing Zhao
2024-03-11 17:11   ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2024-03-13 19:17     ` Qing Zhao
2024-03-18 16:28       ` Qing Zhao
2024-03-18 16:30         ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2024-03-18 16:36           ` Qing Zhao
2024-02-16 19:47 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] Use the .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE in bound sanitizer Qing Zhao
2024-03-11 17:15   ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2024-03-13 19:19     ` Qing Zhao [this message]
2024-03-15 14:29       ` Qing Zhao
2024-02-16 19:47 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] Add the 6th argument to .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE Qing Zhao
2024-02-16 21:39 ` [PATCH v6 0/5]New attribute "counted_by" to annotate bounds for C99 FAM(PR108896) Kees Cook
2024-03-01 14:38 ` Qing Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=F9E33202-8250-4D0C-9A9D-3924AB067964@oracle.com \
    --to=qing.zhao@oracle.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=isanbard@gmail.com \
    --cc=josmyers@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
    --cc=uecker@tugraz.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).