From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-435135-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15753 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2016 16:15:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15737 invoked by uid 89); 2 Sep 2016 16:15:40 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=concur
X-HELO: resqmta-po-12v.sys.comcast.net
Received: from resqmta-po-12v.sys.comcast.net (HELO resqmta-po-12v.sys.comcast.net) (96.114.154.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 16:15:30 +0000
Received: from resomta-po-20v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.244])	by resqmta-po-12v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP	id fr76bGcRklHMYfr7pbrXw1; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 16:15:29 +0000
Received: from up.mrs.kithrup.com ([24.4.193.248])	by resomta-po-20v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP	id fr7nbSt8NdYyLfr7ob1BIe; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 16:15:28 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH, alpha]: ABI change: pass SFmode and SCmode variable arguments by reference
From: Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609021330550.5505@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 16:15:00 -0000
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <FE22C21C-03F0-4192-8839-5D561F4BA2B0@comcast.net>
References: <CAFULd4atfy2fYm-LP3+7FEzMedFFrTP9FsEnJsaoEo+XUsZ8-A@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609021206490.21412@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20160902121157.GA14857@tucnak.redhat.com> <CAFULd4bLRuat3GhzXt_cUv2L8X6w0EJyziuyRQG9DBLxRYKmZA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609021330550.5505@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
To: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfEDWdk76LqXQqQ9/dyBdVfoa/6y+ANZxmEkndRQZQ11CeLPbR2Yeh65nBqu+cfFMZ7TM3+3soOtFs3BkCUxJoGIwyn1r9yRFQWEGhaG2nEAtr+04dfzU 0LibMmLnWbrSfwaX/KQKAlZsmUmm6eLXLo5NiiSdtgzVfXwBFhRKBur4831uxF1mujFpQC95lYXaaBFBX9Ulu26LZgrIQ/oCOuRSNDTDOsWj6l3FLYD7b9X+ mqN8UMjvt1RQQ8g1bTnwdkyZgymihbPbsgEXTSNlZw2/xxgVHT6DApULsW5kcEct
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00098.txt.bz2

On Sep 2, 2016, at 6:31 AM, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 2 Sep 2016, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> 
>> It looks to me that we have no tests for _Complex float variable
>> arguments passing in g*.dg/compat/. There are no xfails for alpha* in
>> this directory, and these arguments would fail for sure for this
>> target.
> 
> I suppose compat tests should be added for _Complex double and _Complex 
> long double variable argument passing as well along with _Complex float, 
> if those types aren't tested for variable argument passing either.

I concur.