From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-294487-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27156 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2011 17:00:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 27120 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2011 17:00:52 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from qmta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (HELO qmta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.48)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:00:35 +0000
Received: from omta24.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.92])	by qmta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast	id wFM91g0081zF43QA5H0ZPQ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:00:33 +0000
Received: from up.mrs.kithrup.com ([24.4.193.8])	by omta24.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast	id wH071g00c0BKwT48kH08qp; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:00:09 +0000
Subject: Re: [testsuite] Run TLS torture tests with -fpic etc.
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimSFTZYD7HzHmf2cWi-B0HpEKXmbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:29:00 -0000
Cc: Rainer Orth <ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FFCACB35-52C7-48DF-9985-6BB1020E0C04@comcast.net>
References: <yddvcwsrz89.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>	<yddk4ct7njh.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <BANLkTimSFTZYD7HzHmf2cWi-B0HpEKXmbg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrishnan@linaro.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg01172.txt.bz2

On Jun 15, 2011, at 9:06 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>> After it has been determined how to check for PIE support, I'm checking
>> this in.
>=20
> I haven't bisected it and not investigated failures in detail because
> I'm about to walk out of the door. This patch might have broken
> testing with arm-linux-gnueabi cross with defaults set to v7-a. (
> configured with --with-arch=3Darmv7-a --with-fpu=3Dneon
> --with-float=3D-softfp) . The GNU ARM linker doesn't allow PIE modules
> where objects contain the MOVW_ABS_NC and MOVT_ABS relocations (which
> are actually absolute relocations) and thus we should require -fPIC /
> -fpic for these cases as well.

The patch isn't suitable as is.  If -PIE requires -fPIC, then anything that=
 adds it or tortures on it, should add both, or torture on both.