On 19.02.2016 16:22, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> Guess it is mostly reasonable (still, this is C++ FE, so I'd prefer
> Jason to ack it), except for:
>

Here are updated versions of the cfns-patch and the pr69856-patch.
Are they OK for trunk when boot-strap and reg-testing succeeds?

Thanks
Bernd.