From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6118 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2016 20:18:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6108 invoked by uid 89); 19 Feb 2016 20:18:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: DUB004-OMC4S14.hotmail.com Received: from dub004-omc4s14.hotmail.com (HELO DUB004-OMC4S14.hotmail.com) (157.55.2.89) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:18:02 +0000 Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.55.2.72]) by DUB004-OMC4S14.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Fri, 19 Feb 2016 12:17:59 -0800 Received: from HE1PR07MB0905.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.162.26.12) by HE1PR07MB0905.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.162.26.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.409.15; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:17:58 +0000 Received: from HE1PR07MB0905.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.26.12]) by HE1PR07MB0905.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.26.12]) with mapi id 15.01.0409.017; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:17:58 +0000 From: Bernd Edlinger To: Jakub Jelinek CC: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Bernd Schmidt , Eric Botcazou , "jason@redhat.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix expansion of TREE_ADDRESSABLE bitwise copies (PR c++/69851) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <20160219190447.GX3017@tucnak.redhat.com> <20160219200842.GZ3017@tucnak.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20160219200842.GZ3017@tucnak.redhat.com> authentication-results: redhat.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;redhat.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=hotmail.de; x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;HE1PR07MB0905;23:roLkZoc0yU4QD4A+keHVBV3XxaevbyyzxqJZI/eaBfj8d4t8ei2UEml1qy5lspjD/MPMFlITF5PpEf0vLiWI6k5fZY9N6T1/sTo74Z5qUdMTdZmSdKaJLxlwhmwo/zvxCV+uBFVSrPKwGZTBVMeTInH48uj1b9dk/tOcjnOLEgsRP2LYxAfOWe0+qo834jYLYRT4e28x3aWZ2cpc4psxoQ==;5:tPEiLXGpVoEgst2e+NYeF8q68nq1mo+OVeMtCq0O+KEzCafTIn3irBGurkFNneStVcT8OwLsVVdw3j3HQUnUxOdCmT/jXffTX+GhByVQEC2Exchn4mRHI67gUXSQNE1spi1iyCjQz5wULgySV3NLsw==;24:v8xumnVZ1pPlvFksIhO4d4L/kciNYyEBbDX3OSk3fRV4stOsfnINEFgZV+wZe1+DQBwf6rjRteySazUvWAJIPqaiySdCZVzAKUTTnx25FkY= x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:HE1PR07MB0905; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 7a7a837a-1431-47f3-ee4d-08d33969bfed x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(432015012)(82015046);SRVR:HE1PR07MB0905;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:HE1PR07MB0905; x-forefront-prvs: 08572BD77F x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(7070004)(98900003);DIR:OUT;SFP:1901;SCL:1;SRVR:HE1PR07MB0905;H:HE1PR07MB0905.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;MLV:ovrnspm;LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: sct-15-1-409-10-msonline-outlook-d6129.templateTenant X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Feb 2016 20:17:57.9196 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1PR07MB0905 X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg01383.txt.bz2 On 19.02.2016 21:08, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 08:04:39PM +0000, Bernd Edlinger wrote: >> but you are just adding another term to this expression: >> !(TREE_CODE (exp) =3D=3D CONSTRUCTOR >> && bitsize % BITS_PER_UNIT =3D=3D 0) > > No. Please read the code again. I'm adding another case > after this one. > Ok, now I see. Sorry for the noise. Bernd.