From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8780 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2016 11:11:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8763 invoked by uid 89); 22 Feb 2016 11:11:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=bin.cheng@arm.com, binchengarmcom, Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:HE1PR08, H*RU:sk:HE1PR08 X-HELO: eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com (HELO eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com) (146.101.78.143) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:11:02 +0000 Received: from EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-db5eur01lp0178.outbound.protection.outlook.com [213.199.154.178]) (Using TLS) by eu-smtp-1.mimecast.com with ESMTP id uk-mta-17-n_mXk8ePSOecWHBUJ9UrbA-1; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:10:57 +0000 Received: from HE1PR08MB0507.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.161.120.154) by HE1PR08MB0507.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.161.120.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.409.15; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:10:56 +0000 Received: from HE1PR08MB0507.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.120.154]) by HE1PR08MB0507.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.120.154]) with mapi id 15.01.0409.024; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:10:56 +0000 From: Bin Cheng To: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" CC: nd Subject: [PATCH GCC]Obvious change, dump min_profitable_estimate, rather than min_profitable_iters Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;HE1PR08MB0507;5:eqfS/4SJj/NVSLTZrbmBCf77QAfWuCx2FA5PlDyROdXq8HKtW2sCnuNjPJHBhuGetf7pxI8zHqzH5n2mbZRci1TbY3s7fDz4THNEvJW2iIDftumqGWttoZvUxBNvAa887Q1nBNVbdczPWsCuFhAQAg==;24:TKvFb2rf1LdnISeneHfcZiBKt7hZ/RZp1ma9UAm5czmVzbhlsRKFDwXlPG/wJDqnUCgTczODEnDIYXiGt+V97gnjtEYkidZiVzD+Kzr959w=;20:jvMlq8Cwj615wYo1QCs+bo5kOuNIYLS++8MsKReg0t1/k3+ArKOTuclNBMG1zduwc9Z38hF/jFTE52/Sn+rewdgKHahGD3tja1Y8wUz2RgVCIDI0ic3kgkGhYJzCRK+kvQbgpgnKKc/eLO5HPHph3P2aGGxE6EwtNTC8tyo9Py8= x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:HE1PR08MB0507; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8155852a-5aa6-428a-9db4-08d33b78d5fe nodisclaimer: True x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(102415293)(102615271)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046);SRVR:HE1PR08MB0507;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:HE1PR08MB0507; x-forefront-prvs: 0860FE717F x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(164054003)(377424004)(40100003)(87936001)(122556002)(450100001)(76576001)(99936001)(86362001)(54356999)(50986999)(11100500001)(106116001)(10400500002)(5008740100001)(5004730100002)(66066001)(586003)(3846002)(102836003)(6116002)(229853001)(2351001)(1096002)(33656002)(1220700001)(4326007)(74316001)(3660700001)(189998001)(3280700002)(92566002)(110136002)(5001960100002)(19580395003)(19580405001)(2906002)(5002640100001)(2501003)(5003600100002)(77096005);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:HE1PR08MB0507;H:HE1PR08MB0507.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;MLV:sfv;LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: arm.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Feb 2016 11:10:55.6407 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: f34e5979-57d9-4aaa-ad4d-b122a662184d X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1PR08MB0507 X-MC-Unique: n_mXk8ePSOecWHBUJ9UrbA-1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_002_HE1PR08MB0507955EB65D10561467D075E7A30HE1PR08MB0507eurp_" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg01446.txt.bz2 --_002_HE1PR08MB0507955EB65D10561467D075E7A30HE1PR08MB0507eurp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 532 Hi, This is an obvious change to vect_estimate_min_profitable_iters. Given the= context, it should dump min_profitable_estimate at patch site, rather than= min_profitable_iters. Or I must mis-understood something in the code. Build successfully, no test needed. Is it OK? I am not sure obvious chang= e rule can be applied during stage4 or not. Thanks, bin 2016-02-22 Bin Cheng * tree-vect-loop.c (vect_estimate_min_profitable_iters): Dump min_profitable_estimate, rather than min_profitable_iters. --_002_HE1PR08MB0507955EB65D10561467D075E7A30HE1PR08MB0507eurp_ Content-Type: text/plain; name=dump-typo-min_profitable_estimate-20160219.txt Content-Description: dump-typo-min_profitable_estimate-20160219.txt Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dump-typo-min_profitable_estimate-20160219.txt"; size=684; creation-date="Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:10:05 GMT"; modification-date="Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:10:05 GMT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-length: 928 SW5kZXg6IGdjYy90cmVlLXZlY3QtbG9vcC5jCj09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT0KLS0tIGdjYy90cmVlLXZlY3QtbG9vcC5jCShyZXZpc2lvbiAyMzM1 NTYpCisrKyBnY2MvdHJlZS12ZWN0LWxvb3AuYwkod29ya2luZyBjb3B5KQpA QCAtMzQzMCw4ICszNDMwLDggQEAgdmVjdF9lc3RpbWF0ZV9taW5fcHJvZml0 YWJsZV9pdGVycyAobG9vcF92ZWNfaW5mbwogICBtaW5fcHJvZml0YWJsZV9l c3RpbWF0ZSA9IE1BWCAobWluX3Byb2ZpdGFibGVfZXN0aW1hdGUsIG1pbl9w cm9maXRhYmxlX2l0ZXJzKTsKICAgaWYgKGR1bXBfZW5hYmxlZF9wICgpKQog ICAgIGR1bXBfcHJpbnRmX2xvYyAoTVNHX05PVEUsIHZlY3RfbG9jYXRpb24s Ci0gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAiICBTdGF0aWMgZXN0aW1hdGUgcHJv Zml0YWJpbGl0eSB0aHJlc2hvbGQgPSAlZFxuIiwKLSAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICBtaW5fcHJvZml0YWJsZV9pdGVycyk7CisJCSAgICAgIiAgU3Rh dGljIGVzdGltYXRlIHByb2ZpdGFiaWxpdHkgdGhyZXNob2xkID0gJWRcbiIs CisJCSAgICAgbWluX3Byb2ZpdGFibGVfZXN0aW1hdGUpOwogCiAgICpyZXRf bWluX3Byb2ZpdGFibGVfZXN0aW1hdGUgPSBtaW5fcHJvZml0YWJsZV9lc3Rp bWF0ZTsKIH0K --_002_HE1PR08MB0507955EB65D10561467D075E7A30HE1PR08MB0507eurp_--