RE: [PATCH v4] DSE: Allow vector type for get_stored_val when read < store

["Li, Pan2" <pan2.li@intel.com>]

Committed, thanks all.

Pan

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> 
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2023 2:39 AM
To: Li, Pan2 <pan2.li@intel.com>
Cc: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>; juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai; Wang, Yanzhang <yanzhang.wang@intel.com>; kito.cheng@gmail.com; Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] DSE: Allow vector type for get_stored_val when read < store

"Li, Pan2" <pan2.li@intel.com> writes:
>> It looks like Jeff approved the patch?
>
> Yes, just would like to double check the way of this patch is expected as following the suggestion of Richard S.

Yeah, it looks good to me, thanks.

Richard

> Pan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com> 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 4:02 PM
> To: Li, Pan2 <pan2.li@intel.com>
> Cc: richard.sandiford@arm.com; juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai; Wang, Yanzhang <yanzhang.wang@intel.com>; kito.cheng@gmail.com; Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] DSE: Allow vector type for get_stored_val when read < store
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 3:30 AM Li, Pan2 <pan2.li@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Richard S,
>>
>> Thanks a lot for reviewing and comments. May I know is there any concern or further comments for landing this patch to GCC-14?
>
> It looks like Jeff approved the patch?
>
> Richard.
>
>> Pan
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Li, Pan2
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2023 8:25 AM
>> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>> Cc: juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai; Wang, Yanzhang <yanzhang.wang@intel.com>; kito.cheng@gmail.com; richard.guenther@gmail.com; richard.sandiford@arm.com; Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] DSE: Allow vector type for get_stored_val when read < store
>>
>> Sorry for disturbing, looks I have a typo for Richard S's email address, cc the right email address for awareness.
>>
>> Pan
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Li, Pan2
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2023 8:18 AM
>> To: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>> Cc: juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai; Wang, Yanzhang <yanzhang.wang@intel.com>; kito.cheng@gmail.com; richard.guenther@gmail.com; richard.sandiford@arm.com2
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] DSE: Allow vector type for get_stored_val when read < store
>>
>> > I wouldn't try to handle that case unless we had actual evidence it was
>> > useful to do so.  Just wanted to point out that unlike pseudos we can
>> > have multiple modes referencing the same memory location.
>>
>> Got the point here, thanks Jeff for emphasizing this, 😉.
>>
>> Pan
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2023 4:12 AM
>> To: Li, Pan2 <pan2.li@intel.com>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>> Cc: juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai; Wang, Yanzhang <yanzhang.wang@intel.com>; kito.cheng@gmail.com; richard.guenther@gmail.com; richard.sandiford@arm.com2
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] DSE: Allow vector type for get_stored_val when read < store
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/12/23 20:22, pan2.li@intel.com wrote:
>> > From: Pan Li <pan2.li@intel.com>
>> >
>> > Update in v4:
>> > * Merge upstream and removed some independent changes.
>> >
>> > Update in v3:
>> > * Take known_le instead of known_lt for vector size.
>> > * Return NULL_RTX when gap is not equal 0 and not constant.
>> >
>> > Update in v2:
>> > * Move vector type support to get_stored_val.
>> >
>> > Original log:
>> >
>> > This patch would like to allow the vector mode in the
>> > get_stored_val in the DSE. It is valid for the read
>> > rtx if and only if the read bitsize is less than the
>> > stored bitsize.
>> >
>> > Given below example code with
>> > --param=riscv-autovec-preference=fixed-vlmax.
>> >
>> > vuint8m1_t test () {
>> >    uint8_t arr[32] = {
>> >      1, 2, 7, 1, 3, 4, 5, 3, 1, 0, 1, 2, 4, 4, 9, 9,
>> >      1, 2, 7, 1, 3, 4, 5, 3, 1, 0, 1, 2, 4, 4, 9, 9,
>> >    };
>> >
>> >    return __riscv_vle8_v_u8m1(arr, 32);
>> > }
>> >
>> > Before this patch:
>> > test:
>> >    lui     a5,%hi(.LANCHOR0)
>> >    addi    sp,sp,-32
>> >    addi    a5,a5,%lo(.LANCHOR0)
>> >    li      a3,32
>> >    vl2re64.v       v2,0(a5)
>> >    vsetvli zero,a3,e8,m1,ta,ma
>> >    vs2r.v  v2,0(sp)             <== Unnecessary store to stack
>> >    vle8.v  v1,0(sp)             <== Ditto
>> >    vs1r.v  v1,0(a0)
>> >    addi    sp,sp,32
>> >    jr      ra
>> >
>> > After this patch:
>> > test:
>> >    lui     a5,%hi(.LANCHOR0)
>> >    addi    a5,a5,%lo(.LANCHOR0)
>> >    li      a4,32
>> >    addi    sp,sp,-32
>> >    vsetvli zero,a4,e8,m1,ta,ma
>> >    vle8.v  v1,0(a5)
>> >    vs1r.v  v1,0(a0)
>> >    addi    sp,sp,32
>> >    jr      ra
>> >
>> > Below tests are passed within this patch:
>> > * The risc-v regression test.
>> > * The x86 bootstrap and regression test.
>> > * The aarch64 regression test.
>> >
>> >       PR target/111720
>> >
>> > gcc/ChangeLog:
>> >
>> >       * dse.cc (get_stored_val): Allow vector mode if read size is
>> >       less than or equal to stored size.
>> >
>> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>> >
>> >       * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/pr111720-0.c: New test.
>> >       * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/pr111720-1.c: New test.
>> >       * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/pr111720-10.c: New test.
>> >       * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/pr111720-2.c: New test.
>> >       * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/pr111720-3.c: New test.
>> >       * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/pr111720-4.c: New test.
>> >       * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/pr111720-5.c: New test.
>> >       * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/pr111720-6.c: New test.
>> >       * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/pr111720-7.c: New test.
>> >       * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/pr111720-8.c: New test.
>> >       * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/pr111720-9.c: New test.
>> OK for the trunk.
>>
>>
>> >
>>
>> > +  else if (VECTOR_MODE_P (read_mode) && VECTOR_MODE_P (store_mode)
>> > +    && known_le (GET_MODE_BITSIZE (read_mode), GET_MODE_BITSIZE (store_mode))
>> > +    && targetm.modes_tieable_p (read_mode, store_mode))
>> > +    read_reg = gen_lowpart (read_mode, copy_rtx (store_info->rhs));
>> >     else
>> >       read_reg = extract_low_bits (read_mode, store_mode,
>> >                                copy_rtx (store_info->rhs));
>> It may not matter, especially for RV, but we could possibly have a
>> mixture of scalar and vector modes in the RTL.  Say a vector store
>> followed by a scalar read or vice-versa.
>>
>> I wouldn't try to handle that case unless we had actual evidence it was
>> useful to do so.  Just wanted to point out that unlike pseudos we can
>> have multiple modes referencing the same memory location.
>>
>> Jeff