public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Li, Pan2" <pan2.li@intel.com>
To: 钟居哲 <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>, "Jeff Law" <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>,
	gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: kito.cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com>, palmer <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
	rdapp.gcc <rdapp.gcc@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix fails of testcases
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 01:18:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW5PR11MB5908B8947382533E4718E3B9A95CA@MW5PR11MB5908.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C0261E7FCF3DE607+2023062007152323846451@rivai.ai>

Committed, thanks Jeff.

Pan

-----Original Message-----
From: Gcc-patches <gcc-patches-bounces+pan2.li=intel.com@gcc.gnu.org> On Behalf Of ???
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 7:15 AM
To: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>; gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: kito.cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com>; palmer <palmer@rivosinc.com>; rdapp.gcc <rdapp.gcc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix fails of testcases

>> Presumably the target selector in the dg-do ensures we only build/run
>> these on the appropriate targets now and we don't need explicitly -march
>> arguments?
Yes. 

>> Assuming that's correct, this is fine for the trunk.
Thanks.


juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
 
From: Jeff Law
Date: 2023-06-20 07:13
To: Juzhe-Zhong; gcc-patches
CC: kito.cheng; palmer; rdapp.gcc
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix fails of testcases
 
 
On 6/19/23 17:04, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-run.c -std=c99 -O3 -ftree-vectorize --param riscv-autovec-preference=fixed-vlmax (test for excess errors)
> Excess errors:
> xgcc: fatal error: Cannot find suitable multilib set for '-march=rv64imafdcv_zicsr_zifencei_zve32f_zve32x_zve64d_zve64f_zve64x_zvl128b_zvl32b_zvl64b'/'-mabi=lp64d'
> compilation terminated.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
>          * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-run.c: Fix fail.
>          * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-zvfh-run.c: Ditto.
>          * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_set-run.c: Ditto.
>          * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_set-zvfh-run.c: Ditto.
Presumably the target selector in the dg-do ensures we only build/run 
these on the appropriate targets now and we don't need explicitly -march 
arguments?
 
Assuming that's correct, this is fine for the trunk.
 
jeff
 

      reply	other threads:[~2023-06-20  1:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-19 23:04 Juzhe-Zhong
2023-06-19 23:13 ` Jeff Law
2023-06-19 23:15   ` 钟居哲
2023-06-20  1:18     ` Li, Pan2 [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MW5PR11MB5908B8947382533E4718E3B9A95CA@MW5PR11MB5908.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=pan2.li@intel.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai \
    --cc=kito.cheng@sifive.com \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=rdapp.gcc@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).