From: Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Cc: avr@gjlay.de, bernds@codesourcery.com,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
iant@google.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Cleanup DW_CFA_GNU_args_size handling
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 17:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <OF1C2C086B.E91ABA9E-ON802578E1.005D4223-802578E1.005D76F1@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E39660E.2020305@redhat.com>
Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote on 08/03/2011 04:15:26 PM:
> On 08/03/2011 07:07 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > Was this assert intended to impose requirements on target's
> > restore_stack_block implemtations? What exactly are those
> > supposed to be?
>
> The assert was not intended to impose requirements, but to figure
> out if I needed to do anything special here.
>
> Binutils has no simulator for spu. Can you file a bug with a
> specific test case and CC me?
Certainly, this is now PR 49968. You should be able to reproduce
the ICE with a spu-elf cross-cc1 without anything else. If you'd
like me to test anything on spu natively, just let me know ...
Bye,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-03 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-01 17:40 Richard Henderson
2011-08-01 18:43 ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-08-01 18:47 ` Richard Henderson
2011-08-01 19:53 ` Denis Chertykov
2011-08-03 12:16 ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-08-03 14:08 ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-08-03 15:13 ` Richard Henderson
2011-08-03 15:49 ` Georg-Johann Lay
2011-08-03 15:53 ` Richard Henderson
2011-08-03 16:24 ` Jeff Law
2011-08-02 2:00 ` Richard Henderson
2011-08-02 22:32 ` Richard Henderson
2011-08-03 14:31 ` H.J. Lu
2011-08-03 17:39 ` H.J. Lu
2011-12-21 5:20 ` Jie Zhang
2011-08-03 14:07 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-03 15:15 ` Richard Henderson
2011-08-03 17:01 ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2011-08-20 15:52 Gerald Pfeifer
2011-08-22 6:42 ` Eric Botcazou
2011-08-23 22:20 ` Richard Henderson
2011-08-24 6:44 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2011-08-24 7:38 ` Richard Henderson
2011-08-24 8:46 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2011-08-24 8:48 ` H.J. Lu
2011-08-24 17:38 ` Eric Botcazou
2011-09-04 18:39 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2011-09-09 10:01 ` Eric Botcazou
2011-09-09 19:07 ` Eric Botcazou
2011-09-09 20:02 ` H.J. Lu
2011-09-10 14:08 ` Eric Botcazou
2011-09-10 19:03 ` H.J. Lu
2011-09-11 2:35 ` Gerald Pfeifer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=OF1C2C086B.E91ABA9E-ON802578E1.005D4223-802578E1.005D76F1@de.ibm.com \
--to=ulrich.weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=avr@gjlay.de \
--cc=bernds@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=iant@google.com \
--cc=rth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).