public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com>
To: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>,
	"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: "nickc@redhat.com" <nickc@redhat.com>,
	Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,
	"ramana.gcc@gmail.com" <ramana.gcc@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] [arm] disable aes-1742098 mitigation for a72 combine tests
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 15:43:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <PAXPR08MB6926BF3E8DD064A73FB9CDBB93A49@PAXPR08MB6926.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <oro7pssrdz.fsf@lxoliva.fsfla.org>

Hi Alexandre,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2023 7:06 AM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: nickc@redhat.com; Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>;
> ramana.gcc@gmail.com; Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] [arm] disable aes-1742098 mitigation for a72 combine tests
> 
> 
> The expected asm output for aes-fuse-[12].c does not correspond to
> that which is generated when -mfix-cortex-a57-aes-1742098 is enabled.
> It was introduced after the test, and enabled by default for the
> selected processor.  Disabling the option restores the circumstance
> that was tested for.
> 
> Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu.
> Tested on arm-vxworks7 (gcc-12) and arm-eabi (trunk).  Ok to install?
> 
> for  gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> 
> 	* gcc.target/arm/aes-fuse-1.c: Add
> 	-mno-fix-cortex-a57-aes-1742098.
> 	* gcc.target/arm/aes-fuse-2.c: Likewise.
> ---
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/aes-fuse-1.c |    4 ++++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/aes-fuse-2.c |    4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/aes-fuse-1.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/aes-fuse-1.c
> index 27b08aeef7ba7..6ffb4991cca69 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/aes-fuse-1.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/aes-fuse-1.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,10 @@
>  /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_crypto_ok } */
>  /* { dg-add-options arm_crypto } */
>  /* { dg-additional-options "-mcpu=cortex-a72 -O3 -dp" } */
> +/* The mitigation applies to a72 by default, and protects the CRYPTO_AES
> +   inputs, such as the explicit xor ops, from being combined like test used to
> +   expect.  */
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-mno-fix-cortex-a57-aes-1742098" } */

Actually the -mcpu=cortex-a72 here is significant only in that it's one of the CPUs that enables AES/AESMC fusion.
So rather than overriding this awkward part with -mno-fix-cortex-a57-aes-1742098 I'd rather just select a different
CPU that enables that fusion and isn't afflicted by this workaround, such as -mcpu=cortex-a53.
More broadly, I think we should be enabling tune_params::FUSE_AES_AESMC for the generic target in A profile, but that would be a non-testsuite change.

Ok with changing the -mcpu option instead.
Thanks,
Kyrill

> 
>  #include <arm_neon.h>
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/aes-fuse-2.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/aes-fuse-2.c
> index 1266a28753169..b72479c0e5726 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/aes-fuse-2.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/aes-fuse-2.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,10 @@
>  /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_crypto_ok } */
>  /* { dg-add-options arm_crypto } */
>  /* { dg-additional-options "-mcpu=cortex-a72 -O3 -dp" } */
> +/* The mitigation applies to a72 by default, and protects the CRYPTO_AES
> +   inputs, such as the explicit xor ops, from being combined like test used to
> +   expect.  */
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-mno-fix-cortex-a57-aes-1742098" } */
> 
>  #include <arm_neon.h>
> 
> 
> --
> Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker                https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
>    Free Software Activist                       GNU Toolchain Engineer
> Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice
> but very few check the facts.  Ask me about <https://stallmansupport.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-20 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-17  7:06 Alexandre Oliva
2023-02-20 15:43 ` Kyrylo Tkachov [this message]
2023-02-22 17:31   ` Alexandre Oliva

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=PAXPR08MB6926BF3E8DD064A73FB9CDBB93A49@PAXPR08MB6926.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nickc@redhat.com \
    --cc=oliva@adacore.com \
    --cc=ramana.gcc@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).