From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2791 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2002 21:40:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2781 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2002 21:40:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.130.111.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2002 21:40:42 -0000 Received: from pulcherrima (pulcherrima [128.130.111.23]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gAELe2aD000711; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 22:40:02 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:40:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Zack Weinberg cc: Mike Stump , Stuart Hastings , Devang Patel , Matt Austern , Geoff Keating , Subject: Re: Add myself to MAINTAINERS In-Reply-To: <87u1ikuecr.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00880.txt.bz2 On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Zack Weinberg wrote: > It seems to me that this file should be identical in all active > branches. In principle, yes, though these active branches may well have some differences (just consider removed ports, new ports, front ends, passes,...). Gerald -- Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/