public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFA:] Take 2 (was: Re: RFC: --enable-checking=valgrind.)
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:57:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0211201408320.48834-100000@dair.pair.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021118203717.A3046@redhat.com>

On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Updated patch is ok.

Thanks for the review.

On request from Neil, I instead committed this for cppfiles.c,
as an obvious change to the patch.  Tested by inspecting
preprocessed output with and without --enable-checking=valgrind
and "manually" checking the expected whitespace change, plus the
expected extra ";" without --enable-checking, compared to the
previous, bootstrapped&checked patch.  Also bootstrapped&checked
without --enable-checking=valgrind.  New ChangeLog entry for
that file:

	* cppfiles.c [!ENABLE_VALGRIND_CHECKING] (VALGRIND_DISCARD):
	Define as empty.
	(read_include_file): When doing the mmap+1 trick,
	valgrind-annotate the byte after the mmap:ed area as readable.
	(purge_cache): Remove above annotation.

Index: cppfiles.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/cppfiles.c,v
retrieving revision 1.156
diff -p -c -r1.156 cppfiles.c
*** cppfiles.c	22 Sep 2002 02:03:16 -0000	1.156
--- cppfiles.c	20 Nov 2002 00:02:38 -0000
*************** Foundation, 59 Temple Place - Suite 330,
*** 27,32 ****
--- 27,38 ----
  #include "intl.h"
  #include "mkdeps.h"
  #include "splay-tree.h"
+ #ifdef ENABLE_VALGRIND_CHECKING
+ #include <valgrind.h>
+ #else
+ /* Avoid #ifdef:s when we can help it.  */
+ #define VALGRIND_DISCARD(x)
+ #endif

  #ifdef HAVE_MMAP_FILE
  # include <sys/mman.h>
*************** read_include_file (pfile, inc)
*** 418,423 ****
--- 424,434 ----
  	  buf = (uchar *) mmap (0, size, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, inc->fd, 0);
  	  if (buf == (uchar *)-1)
  	    goto perror_fail;
+
+ 	  /* We must tell Valgrind that the byte at buf[size] is actually
+ 	     readable.  Discard the handle to avoid handle leak.  */
+ 	  VALGRIND_DISCARD (VALGRIND_MAKE_READABLE (buf + size, 1));
+
  	  inc->mapped = 1;
  	}
        else
*************** purge_cache (inc)
*** 498,504 ****
      {
  #if MMAP_THRESHOLD
        if (inc->mapped)
! 	munmap ((PTR) inc->buffer, inc->st.st_size);
        else
  #endif
  	free ((PTR) inc->buffer);
--- 509,522 ----
      {
  #if MMAP_THRESHOLD
        if (inc->mapped)
! 	{
! 	  /* Undo the previous annotation for the
! 	     known-zero-byte-after-mmap.  Discard the handle to avoid
! 	     handle leak.  */
! 	  VALGRIND_DISCARD (VALGRIND_MAKE_NOACCESS (inc->buffer
! 						    + inc->st.st_size, 1));
! 	  munmap ((PTR) inc->buffer, inc->st.st_size);
! 	}
        else
  #endif
  	free ((PTR) inc->buffer);

brgds, H-P



  reply	other threads:[~2002-11-20 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-10 17:35 RFC: --enable-checking=valgrind Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-11-10 19:34 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-11-11  1:55   ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-11-11 16:53     ` Zack Weinberg
2002-11-11 17:48       ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-11-12  6:02       ` Jan Hubicka
2002-11-12 17:11         ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-11-12 17:21           ` Zack Weinberg
2002-11-13  5:32           ` Jan Hubicka
2002-11-13 13:38             ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-11-18 17:20     ` Richard Henderson
2002-11-18 18:24       ` [RFA:] Take 2 (was: Re: RFC: --enable-checking=valgrind.) Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-11-18 20:37         ` Richard Henderson
2002-11-20 11:57           ` Hans-Peter Nilsson [this message]
2002-11-18 22:12         ` Neil Booth
2002-11-19  4:37           ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-11-18 22:33         ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-11-19  4:33           ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-11-19  7:31             ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-11-19  9:07               ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-11-19  9:15                 ` [RFA:] Take 2 Andreas Jaeger
2002-11-26  5:42         ` [PATCH] Fix configure (was Re: [RFA:] Take 2 (was: Re: RFC: --enable-checking=valgrind.)) Jakub Jelinek
2002-11-26  9:59           ` Richard Henderson
2002-11-28  7:34           ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-11-28  8:08             ` Hans-Peter Nilsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.BSF.4.44.0211201408320.48834-100000@dair.pair.com \
    --to=hp@bitrange.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).