From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25736 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2005 09:26:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 25728 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Dec 2005 09:26:51 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.131.111.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 09:26:49 +0000 Received: from [128.131.111.48] (pulcherrima [128.131.111.48]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA53C13794; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:26:46 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 09:26:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Jan Beulich cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: patch ping In-Reply-To: <43A6792B.76F0.0078.0@novell.com> Message-ID: References: <43A6792B.76F0.0078.0@novell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg01411.txt.bz2 On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Jan Beulich wrote: > Is there any chance to get a review for > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg00166.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg00181.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg00659.html Jan, and others pinging patches: I strongly recommend to provide the original Subject line or a short description in addition to the URL for such pings -- that'll make it much more likely that the responsible maintainers look into them. Gerald