From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24090 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2002 02:28:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24082 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2002 02:28:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Nov 2002 02:28:07 -0000 Received: by nile.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 4190) id 63931F28C9; Sat, 16 Nov 2002 21:28:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB85F28B3; Sat, 16 Nov 2002 21:28:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 18:28:00 -0000 From: Geert Bosch To: Florian Weimer Cc: Robert Dewar , "Joseph S. Myers" , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: ada/8560, [3.2], mainline: GNAT 3.14p is now required In-Reply-To: <87smy1906j.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00984.txt.bz2 On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Florian Weimer wrote: As far as I can tell, no such binaries have been released. I believe that in the current state of the FSF GNAT sources, ACT doesn't want to be too closely associated with them. *sigh* This is not true. The main force to remove any mention of ACT from the code and documentation came from others, including Joseph. I will see what the situation is with the binaries at libre.act-europe.fr. -Geert