From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10617 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2007 18:40:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 10596 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Aug 2007 18:40:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from caip.rutgers.edu (HELO caip.rutgers.edu) (128.6.236.16) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:40:17 +0000 Received: from caipclassic.rutgers.edu (caipclassic.rutgers.edu [128.6.237.54]) by caip.rutgers.edu (8.13.8/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l7AIeDLg023132 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:40:13 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:40:00 -0000 From: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" To: DJ Delorie cc: Gabriel Dos Reis , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Add a __nowarn__ keyword In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <46BC321A.7060007@lu.unisi.ch> <87ps1vtjgp.fsf@soliton.cs.tamu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00697.txt.bz2 On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, DJ Delorie wrote: > > Gabriel Dos Reis writes: > > | #pragma GCC diagnostics push ignore "-Wcast-qual" > > > > DJ, what do you think? > > I think that's an easy change. DJ, over here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg00538.html you said: "We don't really support changing the diagnostics *after* you start defining functions. If that happens to work at all, it's only by coincidence, especially with file-at-a-time optimizations and tree inlining." I expect that for the new push/pop interface to be useful, we'll need to support multiple uses and allow them to occur midway through the file. Do you expect this to be supported now? Thanks, --Kaveh -- Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu