From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2776 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2007 20:19:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 2615 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Aug 2007 20:19:33 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from caip.rutgers.edu (HELO caip.rutgers.edu) (128.6.236.16) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:19:28 +0000 Received: from caipclassic.rutgers.edu (caipclassic.rutgers.edu [128.6.237.54]) by caip.rutgers.edu (8.13.8/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l7SKJO14011577 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:19:24 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:31:00 -0000 From: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" To: Gabriel Dos Reis cc: Richard Guenther , Daniel Berlin , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH INSTALLED]: const typedefs part 19/N In-Reply-To: <87ejho4m9f.fsf@soliton.cs.tamu.edu> Message-ID: References: <4aca3dc20708270733p7181ee8dreb4ca0e804fb8eaf@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000708270909w4fa3fcf3q6b7cb9decee5bffb@mail.gmail.com> <87ejho4m9f.fsf@soliton.cs.tamu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg02011.txt.bz2 On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > "Kaveh R. GHAZI" writes: > > [...] > > | It could mean making it *possible* to build with a C++ compiler, i.e. use > | -Wc++-compat for the whole compiler but still allow using plain C to > | bootstrap. (Has anyone tried this recently? Gaby?) > > I haven't tried recently, mostly because I have been travelling and > away from my development machine. I suspect this is probably a good > time to try again. > -- Gaby Is it sufficient to get the code compiling with -Wc++-compat, or are there other problems? BTW, what exactly does -Wc++-compat warn about? The docs only talk about implicit coversion from void * to non-void *. But I imagine other things like using "class", etc could have problems. Could you please mention what you came across in previous attempts? Thanks, --Kaveh -- Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu