From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6236 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2008 21:01:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 6226 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Feb 2008 21:01:56 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from caip.rutgers.edu (HELO caip.rutgers.edu) (128.6.236.16) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:01:16 +0000 Received: from caipclassic.rutgers.edu (caipclassic.rutgers.edu [128.6.237.54]) by caip.rutgers.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1FL127n028292 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:01:06 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:03:00 -0000 From: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" To: Janis Johnson cc: Paolo Carlini , Gcc Patch List Subject: Re: [C++ PATCH]: testsuite PIC fix for has_nothrow* tests In-Reply-To: <1203089786.6955.0.camel@janis-laptop> Message-ID: References: <479D06CB.3080906@suse.de> <1203089786.6955.0.camel@janis-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00586.txt.bz2 On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Janis Johnson wrote: > On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 15:39 -0500, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote: > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Paolo Carlini wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > see the discussion on the audit trail of c++/26099. I think we can just > > > > go with this simple fix, for 4.3.0 at least. > > > > > > > > Ok for mainline? > > > > Paolo. > > > > > > Ping? > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-01/msg01330.html > > > > > > (This fixes the last pic-specific error I get on mainline). > > > > Hi Janis - would you please review this one for Paolo? I'd like it to go > > in before we branch 4.3. > > OK. > > Please let me know about other testsuite patches I might > have missed. > Janis I think we're up to date on what I've submitted, (plus this one from Paolo). But I'm going to post at least one more (for 4.2) in a moment. Thanks, --Kaveh -- Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu