From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bernd Schmidt <bernds@redhat.com>
To: <law@redhat.com>
Cc: John David Anglin <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>, <mark@codesourcery.com>, <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch 
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 07:55:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0104231555240.7552-100000@host140.cambridge.redhat.com>
References: <18300.988011951@slagheap.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-04/msg01082.html

On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 law@redhat.com wrote:

>   In message <Pine.LNX.4.33.0104231017340.7552-100000@host140.cambridge.redhat.
> com>you write:
>   > > There must be a label uses problem somewhere.  In any event, the testcase
>   > > for duplicate symbols will compile with the patch installed.
>   >
>   > You might want to look at the patches I installed on the 2.95 branch after
>   > 2.95.3.  This sounds like it's exactly the same problem.
> Are you referring to this patch?
>
> 2001-03-28  Bernd Schmidt  <bernds@redhat.com>
>
>         * flow.c (propagate_block): When trying to delete a case vector, cope
>         if its label has LABEL_PRESERVE_P set.
>         * jump.c (jump_optimize_1): Move call to delete_barrier_successors to
>         a point where JUMP_LABELS and LABEL_NUSES are set up properly.
>         (delete_barrier_successors): If deleting a table jump, delete the case
>         vector as well.
>         * varasm.c (force_const_mem): If we have a label, set LABEL_PRESERVE_P
>         so it won't get deleted.

Yes.


Bernd