* ada/8560, [3.2], mainline: GNAT 3.14p is now required
@ 2002-11-16 3:03 Florian Weimer
2002-11-16 4:16 ` Joseph S. Myers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Florian Weimer @ 2002-11-16 3:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches
The patch below documents the new build requirements.
Okay for 3.2 and mainline?
--- install.texi.~1.92.2.29.2.10.~ Sat Nov 16 11:58:47 2002
+++ install.texi Sat Nov 16 11:59:03 2002
@@ -1071,7 +1071,7 @@
@section Building the Ada compiler
In order to build GNAT, the Ada compiler, you need a working GNAT
-compiler (GNAT version 3.13 or later, or GCC version 3.1 or later),
+compiler (GNAT version 3.14 or later, or GCC version 3.1 or later),
since the Ada front end is written in Ada (with some
GNAT-specific extensions), and GNU make.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ada/8560, [3.2], mainline: GNAT 3.14p is now required
2002-11-16 3:03 ada/8560, [3.2], mainline: GNAT 3.14p is now required Florian Weimer
@ 2002-11-16 4:16 ` Joseph S. Myers
2002-11-16 4:19 ` Florian Weimer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2002-11-16 4:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Weimer; +Cc: gcc-patches
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Florian Weimer wrote:
> The patch below documents the new build requirements.
>
> Okay for 3.2 and mainline?
Are these in fact required for 3.2, or just for mainline?
When are we going to get the collection of GNAT binaries (GCC 3.1 or
later) for various systems (including any not supported by ACT for which
users contribute binaries) that was promised for the "libre site" a long
time ago (e.g. <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-02/msg01233.html>)? If
already there, they should be linked from the Binaries section of the
manual.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ada/8560, [3.2], mainline: GNAT 3.14p is now required
2002-11-16 4:16 ` Joseph S. Myers
@ 2002-11-16 4:19 ` Florian Weimer
2002-11-16 18:28 ` Geert Bosch
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Florian Weimer @ 2002-11-16 4:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: gcc-patches
"Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> writes:
> Are these in fact required for 3.2, or just for mainline?
According to ada/8560, it's required for 3.2, too.
> When are we going to get the collection of GNAT binaries (GCC 3.1 or
> later) for various systems (including any not supported by ACT for which
> users contribute binaries) that was promised for the "libre site" a long
> time ago (e.g. <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-02/msg01233.html>)? If
> already there, they should be linked from the Binaries section of the
> manual.
As far as I can tell, no such binaries have been released. I believe
that in the current state of the FSF GNAT sources, ACT doesn't want to
be too closely associated with them. *sigh*
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ada/8560, [3.2], mainline: GNAT 3.14p is now required
2002-11-16 4:19 ` Florian Weimer
@ 2002-11-16 18:28 ` Geert Bosch
2002-11-17 0:34 ` Florian Weimer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Geert Bosch @ 2002-11-16 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Weimer; +Cc: Robert Dewar, Joseph S. Myers, gcc-patches
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Florian Weimer wrote:
As far as I can tell, no such binaries have been released. I believe
that in the current state of the FSF GNAT sources, ACT doesn't want to
be too closely associated with them. *sigh*
This is not true. The main force to remove any mention of ACT from the
code and documentation came from others, including Joseph.
I will see what the situation is with the binaries at libre.act-europe.fr.
-Geert
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ada/8560, [3.2], mainline: GNAT 3.14p is now required
2002-11-16 18:28 ` Geert Bosch
@ 2002-11-17 0:34 ` Florian Weimer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Florian Weimer @ 2002-11-17 0:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Bosch; +Cc: Robert Dewar, Joseph S. Myers, gcc-patches
Geert Bosch <bosch@gnat.com> writes:
> On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Florian Weimer wrote:
> As far as I can tell, no such binaries have been released. I believe
> that in the current state of the FSF GNAT sources, ACT doesn't want to
> be too closely associated with them. *sigh*
>
> This is not true.
I can fully understand if you do not want to release binaries at this
stage, although I regret it.
(The maintainership issue is completely unrelated.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ada/8560, [3.2], mainline: GNAT 3.14p is now required
@ 2002-11-17 7:30 Geert Bosch
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Geert Bosch @ 2002-11-17 7:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Weimer; +Cc: Robert Dewar, Joseph S. Myers, gcc-patches
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Florian Weimer wrote:
I can fully understand if you do not want to release binaries at this
stage, although I regret it.
We do want to provide binaries. I'll look into this, as I said.
-Geert
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-11-17 15:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-11-16 3:03 ada/8560, [3.2], mainline: GNAT 3.14p is now required Florian Weimer
2002-11-16 4:16 ` Joseph S. Myers
2002-11-16 4:19 ` Florian Weimer
2002-11-16 18:28 ` Geert Bosch
2002-11-17 0:34 ` Florian Weimer
2002-11-17 7:30 Geert Bosch
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).