From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11277 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2004 14:18:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11247 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2004 14:18:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www.eyesopen.COM) (12.96.199.11) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2004 14:18:07 -0000 Received: from localhost (roger@localhost) by www.eyesopen.COM (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i3NChuj04334; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 06:43:56 -0600 Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:18:00 -0000 From: Roger Sayle To: Zdenek Dvorak cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Nathan Sidwell Subject: Re: Patch ping In-Reply-To: <20040423134759.GA20649@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg01582.txt.bz2 On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Zdenek Dvorak wrote: > > >http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-03/msg01148.html > > > -- the patch to prevent code with -fprofile-arcs and > > > -fbranch-probabilities from diverging before the > > > profile feedback pass (which may cause profile missmatches) > > this one is ok, wrt the libgcov bits > > but you cannot approve the builtins.c/calls.c changes, right? These bits are OK for mainline, too. Roger --