From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27756 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2004 02:04:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27455 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2004 02:04:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www.eyesopen.COM) (12.96.199.11) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2004 02:04:34 -0000 Received: from localhost (roger@localhost) by www.eyesopen.COM (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5124Sf12557; Mon, 31 May 2004 20:04:28 -0600 Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 02:04:00 -0000 From: Roger Sayle To: Eric Botcazou cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Unreviewed patches In-Reply-To: <200405312059.17774.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 On Mon, 31 May 2004, Eric Botcazou wrote: > Clarify description of -static-libgcc: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-04/msg01712.html This is OK. > Fix ACATS failure on i586: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-04/msg01779.html This is OK for mainline. > Fix ACATS failures on SPARC: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-05/msg00286.html This is OK for mainline. Are these ACATS failures 3.4.x regressions? If so, you might want to ask Mark about backporting these patches for gcc 3.4.1 after they've been on mainline for a few days without problems. Roger --