From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29439 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2004 20:07:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29290 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2004 20:07:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www.eyesopen.com) (208.41.78.163) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2004 20:07:52 -0000 Received: from localhost (roger@localhost) by www.eyesopen.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i9DJARn11544; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:10:27 -0600 Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 20:20:00 -0000 From: Roger Sayle To: Ulrich Weigand cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Unreviewed patch In-Reply-To: <200410131932.VAA23270@faui1m.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg01137.txt.bz2 On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > > Would it be OK for ask you to bootstrap and regression test this patch > > on at least one other platform? May be x86 and/or powerpc? As you'll > > appreciate accepting patches to reload is a risky business, even before > > stage3. > > Sure. I don't have ready access to powerpc, but I'll test the patch > on x86 and ia64, if that's OK with you. (Testing will take at least > until tomorrow, though.) > > OK if testing is successful everywhere? Sure. I do have one more small request though. Is it possible to add a new test case to the testsuite? You mentioned in your original e-mail, this problem is currently latent and only exposed by a change you're planning on making to ths s390 backend. If it's relatively easy to reduce a test (that at least triggers this code), it would be nice to add it to the testsuite, perhaps when you commit your backend changes. Roger --