From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5952 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2006 20:40:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 5943 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Mar 2006 20:40:06 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from eyesopen.com (HELO www.eyesopen.com) (208.41.78.163) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 20:40:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (roger@localhost) by www.eyesopen.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k2BKT4o10147; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 13:29:07 -0700 Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 20:40:00 -0000 From: Roger Sayle To: Uttam Pawar cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Patch ping In-Reply-To: <1142019417.18913.250.camel@linux.site> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00679.txt.bz2 On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Uttam Pawar wrote: > Ping. Can anybody review the following patches again, please? > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01484.html The bt-load.c fix is OK, to close PR rtl-optimiztion/25739. I think the other changes are suitably obvious enough, even if not part of the middle-end, that I can approve them. Remember to commit the version with the "if" checks before the calls to free, and mention the above PR number in the ChangeLog entry. > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01377.html This one is also OK for mainline. Thanks, Roger --