From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4168 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2004 19:02:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4159 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2004 19:02:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lon-mail-3.gradwell.net) (193.111.201.127) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 22 Jun 2004 19:02:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 44987 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2004 19:02:35 -0000 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (postmaster%pop3.polyomino.org.uk@81.187.227.50) by lon-mail-3.gradwell.net with SMTP; 22 Jun 2004 19:02:35 -0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BcqXS-0001ww-J4; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:02:34 +0000 Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:37:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" X-X-Sender: jsm28@digraph.polyomino.org.uk To: Richard Kenner cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa In-Reply-To: <10406221853.AA08995@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> Message-ID: References: <10406221853.AA08995@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg01783.txt.bz2 On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Richard Kenner wrote: > and see how it has increased as well. I'm also not sure that -O0 is > a good comparison point because the amount of data we keep is related The comparison for optimizing is worse (especially for compilation time, increased by a factor of 69). I gave the comparison for -O0 because we do many more optimizations so there's more of a case for growth in time and memory consumption when optimizing, though I doubt we do 69 times as much optimization in any meaningful measure. -- Joseph S. Myers http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/ jsm@polyomino.org.uk (personal mail) jsm28@gcc.gnu.org (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)