From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4983 invoked by alias); 18 May 2006 20:14:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 4972 invoked by uid 22791); 18 May 2006 20:14:50 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.131.111.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 May 2006 20:14:29 +0000 Received: from acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (acrux [128.131.111.60]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B0E137AE; Thu, 18 May 2006 22:14:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 21:58:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Paul Brook cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Mike Stump , Mark Shinwell Subject: Re: Add myself to MAINTAINERS In-Reply-To: <200605181820.06141.paul@codesourcery.com> Message-ID: References: <446C5FE9.30500@codesourcery.com> <6A6957D5-4F1C-46B0-B4F4-DB802B4E899B@apple.com> <200605181820.06141.paul@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00949.txt.bz2 On Thu, 18 May 2006, Paul Brook wrote: > I'd say the fact that someone has been granted write access to the > repository counts as pre-approval. Absolutely. > From http://gcc.gnu.org/svnwrite.html#authenticated > > "Once we have this information we will set up an account on gcc.gnu.org and > inform you by mail. At this point you should be able to check out a tree with > SVN and add yourself to the MAINTAINERS file to test write access, following > the instructions below" > > Admittedly "following instructions below" is somewhat vague, but I was > under the impression that anyone with write-after-approval access should > automatically add themselves to the MAINTAINERS file. Should as in RFC lingo, yes. Do you have a proposal on how to improve wording of this page, Paul (or Mark)? We want our documentation to be as clear as possible. Gerald